We’ll wake up tomorrow with Clarence Thomas riding off into the sunset in a new RV, John Oliver poorer by one RV and $1mil/year, and a supreme court justice that doesn’t need to shave everyday.

P.S.: Someone get word to John Oliver that sooner rather than later might be a good time to rescind his offer!

“What bigger break could there be?” she asked.

The way I tend to think about it these days is that this guy is part of a community where that kind of thing is normal; otherwise, why would he share it?

If anything sexual is so big of a deal to him (and I infer it is from the statements he made), then how does that align with shielding his boss from the allegations made against him?

That guy?

The guy who pays money to a third party company to log all of his internet browsing habits and share them with his son as proof he isn’t looking at porn?

I’m sure that a company that caters to highly conservative people who feel the need to be “kept honest” with their browsing history does a bangup job keeping their servers up to date, and no foreign intelligence teams focus on it at all after the Speaker of the House bragged about using it.

So what do we do next? I mean, in terms of things that might actually help?

Become a society with strong critical thinking skills who values people based on reasoned takes based on experience and science over people who value rapid, loud appeals to emotion.

One piece of that is recognizing that doing things like putting flat earthers up in high altitude planes or near space is a waste of resources that could’ve been spent doing something better.

EDIT: that last paragraph was an incomplete thought. Individual flat earthers have done the whole scientific method thing, and proved themselves incorrect and stepped away from it. How do you handle the people that refuse to be convinced? If there’s no level evidence that a person will accept and they’re out in the forest commons chopping down trees to build a tower to whatever is on top of earth, how do you tolerate it at a societal level? It’s still an incomplete thought.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Murphy#Health

Good teachers: “It’s broken again. That’s on me. I don’t know what I’m doing wrong with the passes. To shreds you say?”

Personally, a single “bathroom pass” NFC card that a teacher hands out to any student in their class that needs a bathroom visit wouldn’t cause me much security consternation; that any student could be carrying the pass at any given time is enough anonymztion for my concerns. I’d be more concerned about germs; a group pass is going to get nasty.

Add in a requirement that the scanners have to be connected to an airgapped system, and the system software ONLY reports/stores if a trip took more than X minutes, where X is some agreed upon time by teachers/parents/etc how long a trip should take, and I think that’s a a decent basis for a product that most school districts will completely ignore while they get wined/dined by someone who completely intends to sell the system at a loss and profit off the data collected.

That puts some context to it.

I was imagining something entirely different.

Well I’m completely missing something then. If there’s no golf then what’s the place for?

Also, grass parking with a half empty parking lot?

I guess they know what they’re doing. Every golf course I’ve ever been on has landscaping to set up secluded holes and to put tractor sheds and pump houses out of immediate sight. I guess that’s what I expected

They don’t price their based on cost + profit. They price their product based on what analysts think the market will bear.

And for your original question: “How can they be losing money when prices are higher than ever”

They didn’t lose money. In Q3 of 2026 they beat earnings estimates by 27%, and missed revenue by 0.25%. The stonk dropped because its price was based on analysts’ guesses on what it would do in the future, and they’ve revised that estimate down based on Intel’s earnings report and what they think the AI market is going to look like. And so the stonk price collapsed all the way back to where it was in…April of this year.

have been placed on a floating barge

I guess there weren’t any open patches of ground to put them on.

There are recent parallels in both the firearms and 3D printing industries. California 3D printers now get to have restrictions on them because of recent legislation. When technology bridges the “moat” to some Unreachable Fortress it’s inevitable for lobbying to appear since you can’t move the Fortress. Chinese open source models and weights are that bridge, and here we are.

I’m sure there’s market research, focus groups, and unfilmed talks where people air the ideas out to gauge if they can get national traction, but it’s hard to tell with techbros if we’re seeing the vetted idea put to film or if he really thinks the idea that there’s just one computer on earth (that he owns) that everybody can buy time on. I trend towards the latter given the market for software you actually own instead of license, and unlocked hardware.

There are already rumblings about RISC-V.

There are three seconds between those pictures.

No. They have already told off a 27 year old to ensure that the backdoor(s) they put there on purpose are still there when he gets done. It’s been worse than you thought for years.

• https://www.tomshardware.com/news/cisco-backdoor-hardcoded-accounts-software,37480.html

Someone with no understanding of what quality software looks like who also doesn’t have to deal with the consequences of every Cisco switch and router on the planet either being old and unsupported, or new and absolutely full of security holes.

They can buy it on the used market and destroy it.

<proper noun> absolutely hates the idea of [other] people <gerund> their own <noun> at home, argues they shouldn’t <verb> <noun>.

I happen to like verbing my own noun.

Margin is a short term loan from your broker that requires interest payments. As noted in the boglehead article, usually this requires borrowing against your portfolio (or if you’re using Robinhood, you flip the switch that allows margin and borrow against a software bug). The brokerages have high speed computers programmed with people who like money to make sure anything risky you do on margin doesn’t come back on them, and they can/will sell shares out of your portfolio to balance their risk.

If you want more exposure than you have cash, there are funds like $NTSX that use witchcraft to effectively capture 90% of the 500 largest stocks in the US (saying S&P 500 is trademarked or something) and 60% of the bond market, for a total of 150%. I don’t know much more about it except to say that if the fund goes to zero, which everything could, your exposure is limited to the money you put into it.

Note that none of this is investment advice, and any cash you stick in a mattress loses purchasing power to inflation.

Sources:

• https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Margin
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d80ahvRSV8E (a man loses a bunch of money on stock options that he didn’t have and livestreamed it for some reason)