As usual, it’s going to be only for the free, or “cheaper” tier at first, then it will creep up to the other tiers. We’ve seen this happen time and again.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers

I remember reading a few days ago that OpenAI basically ordered 3 times as much RAM as they could use this year. There are also data centers fully equipped but not turned on as the local power grid could not handle the added demand.

I see “eat the rich” as “use them as fertilizer”.

The article makes no mention of any missile or warhead, only op speaks about that, be careful.

Unfortunately true, I agree. There would be an enormous amount of work to be done, starting with replacing that admin, and it would take time and effort. Still, I don’t see a way, even with all the benevolence in the world, to restrict reproduction in a positive way. Also, I honestly believe that it would end up having a similar effect to banning alcohol for example: people wouldn’t stop reproducing, they would hide it, which in turn means no access to healthcare or education for those children, as they would have to be hidden from the government, thus complicating things even further.

If you bothered to read the whole thread, I do propose a solution. Education.

Please explain to me how you would go about selecting who can reproduce and who can’t then. I’ve asked this question multiple times and so far none of you “eugenics are good when it favors me” seem to want to answer it.

Eugenics is about purity of your population. That is a textbook component of fascism, whether you like it or not.

Writing “the 50th vote” instead of “another vote” or even “a 50th vote” implies that specific vote is more important, like reaching a threshold. At least that’s how I see it.

Well at this point you can escalate, since they escalated first after being kicked out. But you don’t start by arresting.

Yes, and in the case of restrictions on reproduction, I do not see any way to implement that without having that gigantic oppressive infrastructure.

Also, “benevolent” eugenics is still eugenics, still fascist.

False equivalency. Also waiting on your criteria for a reproduction permit.

Again, eugenics is fascist.

Also, even with the best effort to restrict reproduction in a “good” way, the instant your administration changes, those restrictions will change too. Do you want the Trump admin to choose who can reproduce?

Education is the answer. Always has been, always will be.

Eugenics is fascist. You are defending a fascist ideology. Take a step back to consider that please.

Also curious to know how you would decide who gets to reproduce.

So? Does that make eugenics a good thing? No it doesn’t.

No. Just no. That’s fucking eugenics. No.

https://lemmy.ca/comment/20265924

Why would we need an alternative to Wikipedia?

I mean there was already the Conservapedia, that’s nothing new.

To follow up on this, I never heard about someone switching to leftist ideals after brain damage, always to the right.

You’re reaching a lot in your “theory” trying to attribute logic (however few of it) to the ramblings of a delusional, unintelligent and dementia riddled old man. I do not believe for a second that there’s any logic other than “big number make me feel good”.

And the deception part would require him to understand and accept that he was wrong, which he’s shown to be completely unable to do numerous times.