• 0 Posts
  • 579 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle


  • Ok, had my wife send me the file from my network

    networks:
      main-network:
        name: ${COMPOSE_PROJECT_NAME}
        attachable: true
        ipam:
          driver: default
          config:
            - subnet: configure
              ip_range: this
              gateway: yoself
    
    services:
      # Gluetun - <https://github.com/qdm12/gluetun>
      gluetun:
        image: qmcgaw/gluetun
        container_name: gluetun
        networks:
          - main-network
        cap_add:
          - NET_ADMIN
        environment:
          - PUID=${PUID}
          - PGID=${PGID}
          - TZ=${TZ}
          - VPN_SERVICE_PROVIDER=custom
          - VPN_TYPE=wireguard
          - VPN_PORT_FORWARDING=true
          - VPN_PORT_FORWARDING_PROVIDER=protonvpn
          - WIREGUARD_ADDRESSES=use your own
          - WIREGUARD_ALLOWED_IPS=0.0.0.0/0
          - WIREGUARD_PRIVATE_KEY=nope
          - WIREGUARD_PUBLIC_KEY=69420
          - WIREGUARD_DNS=
          - VPN_ENDPOINT_PORT=
          - VPN_ENDPOINT_IP=
        volumes:
          - ${DOAPPDAT}/gluetun:/gluetun
    

    I left in the wireguard stuff without my details because for me Gluetun refused to work when setting the exact same info to wg0.conf, so I define it in my compose

    Then, services that rely on gluetun go below and look like:

    # qBittorrent - <https://hub.docker.com/r/linuxserver/qbittorrent>
    qbittorrent:
      container_name: qbittorrent
      network_mode: container:gluetun
      image: lscr.io/linuxserver/qbittorrent:latest
      depends_on:
        gluetun:
          condition: service_healthy
      restart: unless-stopped
    
    

    Works perfectly when I run it through portainer



  • What works for me:

    Networks first in docker-compose

    Gluetun first in Services, uses the network I set for it and the stack

    Everything else goes below it, relying on the gluetun CONTAINER (I plan to have another stack running gluetun for other reasons so having it check the service is a no go for me) to be running in a HEALTHY state

    All are set to restart: unless-stopped except gluetun, which is never

    The expected behaviour is that containers will always wait for gluetun to report that it’s healthy before trying again to restart. Should gluetun fail and crash for any reason it won’t reboot and potentially fuck itself up harder, and no services will be able to start because it’s not reporting healthy.

    This works perfectly in portainer and should when running docker-compose up, but for me it took portainer to work. Saw someone somewhere mention it has some sort of priority handling override built into it that docker itself doesn’t, meaning it’s less likely to fuck that lind of thing up, but idk how true it is

    I’ll see if I can remember to snag a couple snips of my YAML to make it more clear


  • My main 2 reasons for installing it both come from needing to restart services sometimes:

    Portainer let me allow other people access to restarting specific containers that occasionally misbehave

    Portainer lets me update and restart all of the containers running in my VPN stack without breaking. For some ungodly reason, even with dependency set and everything in docker-compose, a CLI reboot will basically always start a service or 2 before gluetun is actually advertising it’s in a healthy state and everything breaks. With portainer that doesn’t happen, with the exact same compose, and I don’t get why lol





  • Look, you can’t even make a simple logical conjecture

    I pointed out that your original point about trump supporters getting banned is because they break rules. I then pointed out that you were wrong for claiming 40% of Americans support him. Logic has had 0 to do with this discussion, but I like how you toss it in there to make yourself feel smart

    And yet you claim to have a graduate degree in a math-related subject?

    No, I claim to have above-college-level training in statistics, making fun of your “high school” comment. Your reading comprehension is fucking trash



  • And I think it’s interesting that you likely talk in the same tone to all your political opponents while insinuating its their lack of education that is the problem

    Only when someone says blatantly wrong and/or stupid shit, like you

    makes them feel like listening to your arguments and carefully considering them

    Objectively, scientifically, we know that’s not what happens. I do it because you asswipes don’t deserve even the respect of basic human interaction until you accept basic human rights as such, and it’s funny to see you rage online

    Compared to you, I do understand a lot about polls, population samples, sampling methodologies, importance weighting, confidence intervals, and other related stuff. On a level way above high school.

    Oh yeah? Well my level of understanding is above college so nyeh, I win. I can tell you’re full of shit from the smell of what’s coming out





  • If you take any major gaming publications scores as at all legitimate then I have a bridge to sell you

    Major publications give it a passable score because “lol glitches are Bethesdas thing”, ignoring objective critique because of reputation, as well as our of fear that they won’t be given access to the next product released by the or Microsoft because they give games “bad publicity”

    Starfield is a broken, poorly written, dumpster fire of a game. It objectively doesn’t function correctly often, like many Bethesda products, and was designed by a team lead by a man allergic to basic game design ethos (seriously fuck Emil, my dog could do game design better than me "fuck design docs). It has moments of being interesting and, much like Skyrim, could be the base for some cool mods, but people hated it so much it won’t ever even get that


  • Relying on favorable interpretations of “reasonably functional” is just begging lobbyists and lawyers to ruin it for everyone.

    As is explained by Ross in the very video good over this initiative:

    If it’s successful in getting the votes then the EU will base what they do off of expert opinion and consultation. You’re going in with the assumption that it’ll work exactly as it does in the US it seems, which is silly as shit to do


  • My guess is that this game pivoted during development

    Nah, the game matches pretty well with what Lyin’ Todd said he wanted to make almost 20 years ago

    It’s also very clearly their usual design decisions but in a new setting

    If anything the issue is that they stayed stuck in EXACTLY their usual development methods: no design document because Emil doesn’t like them, their writers make their quests too, and use an engine that’s absolutely not meant for the kind of game they’re making ON TOP of being ancient and garbage