1·
1 month agodeleted by creator
ESC
hail yourself
- 0 Posts
- 9 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
Cake day: May 28th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Yeah, they are good. I’ve been reading them since around 2015-2016 iirc. I used to hang out on the same subs and ran into Corey’s original account fairly often.
To me laws establishing private property rights in a capitalist framework are the NAP in actual practice, so I think we can agree to disagree.
True. But it is both liberalism and a con. The con is in branding it as something other than liberalism, which he was able to do by conflating positive and negative freedoms.
Rothbardian libertarianism (aka ancap) is liberalism. He’s been on the record about it being a con.
Traditionally the term means anarchist. The concept of an NAP (which amounts to the legalized protection of inequality) is liberal, not anarchist. Anarchism supports the physical protection of equality because inequality is hierarchy.
They aren’t advocating it per se, but they are an anarchist often commenting on anarchist issues.
Stacking wasn’t perfect but even with stacks of doom it allowed for a balanced variety of viable playstyles. You pretty much have to cheese a min/max urban sprawl (iirc - it’s been years) on Civ5 to beat the higher difficulty levels because of the differences in action economy, which undermines replayability. Replayability is the heart of Civ.
Some changes in G&K seemed like they were designed to patch the economics to a degree.
I was poor and didn’t want to have to pay for a patch, so I ended up getting tired out on vanilla and didn’t get into G&K much by the time I could justify buying it. But from the discussions I’ve seen the issue was too fundamental to simply be patched over. It’s still a good game but Civ4 reigns as king imo.
California is already draining itself on tax breaks for property owners, and capping insurance increases would rapidly accelerate the current flight of insurers out of the state.
And you want that in exchange for a rent hike cap on 51,700 rent-controlled units, in a city of 4 million? Seriously?
3·2 months agoIt looks like it was a private operator responsible and the government has instructed them to be more transparent about it.
Artificially assisting waterfalls during the dry season happens in tourist traps around the world.
2·3 months agodeleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator