No its his brother
No its his brother
The ultimate solution is to allow for P2P online with official servers as the default, and just warn people that you might encounter cheaters if you use P2P. Can even go a step further and separate the player pools between unmodded and modded clients. So you can play online with mods, but run the risk of encountering cheaters. P2P should mean you can ban certain people from invading you due to hacks or high ping similar to DSCM back in the day, but in-game.
I’m talking about offline/online generically here, not whether it’s using the official servers. I know it’s not using the official servers which is why you can play without anti-cheat
One of the reason why seamless coop is so good is you can play with mods without having to go offline and disable anti-cheat. I fully expect their implementation of this won’t allow for that.
The fact that I can’t do something as simple as turning off that god-awful chromatic aberration without anti-cheat banning me for cheating is so ridiculous. It’s so bad that I only play offline and at the moment, Seamless Coop is the only way I can play multiplayer.
It depends how long between sessions. The game is a lot like a book - you can read (play) for an hour at a time and put the book (game) down anytime then pickup where you left off. It might be a problem if you haven’t played for a few weeks as you might forget where you are in the story.
I’m confident its people using Chrome with Adblock Plus
Preview works on my instance, but not on blahaj zone
Federated git repos doesn’t mean that the source code will be replicated across instances. It just means you can do things like create tickets and pull requests across instances.
Is it? I just have it auto-generate in my IDE with snippets. If I was using TS I would still document using TSDoc anyway. You can use jsconfig.json
instead.
Personally I’d rather use JSDoc in my own projects for type annotations and call it a day. I find TS a bit annoying but that might be because I’m not that familiar with it.
Considering Trustarc themselves have nothing to gain in allowing vendor tracking for services that use this, and the primary goal being to “ensure you remain compliant with global privacy regulations” (their words). Unless their market audience are services who want it to be as intentionally shit as possible? Maybe.
That is just lemmy.
Lemme compile it all into a 20 second tiktok video