A mess of a girl, free on the internet. A spicy meatball indeed :3
Follow me on bluesky( @endlesseden24.bsky.social@bsky.brid.gy )

  • 0 Posts
  • 96 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 16th, 2026

help-circle



  • if you argue with your parent and they have to run to the other for approval. they are not parents, they are children raising children and seeking attention.

    legitimately, if this is the case, the father will take the mothers side even if she said the kid dropped a atom bomb on her, because straight up the other parent doesn’t care and only cares about keeping things quiet.







  • while I’m with you, we have to hope that it all falls apart. otherwise we are looking at the collapse of humanity. Nzi Germany was broke, if it would of continued without the US joining the war, the economy was doomed from the start. it was hedged on government bonds as currency and the companies went with it because of the promises of Slve labour of undersirables.

    htler was obsessed with ancient Rome and wanted to build infrastructure with a indentured servants. problem was never the labour but the supplies. even if you had control of everything, the economic system would of collapsed without trade, there was no trade, because there was no one to buy anything and nothing to buy. the moment the war ended there would be no industry needing the raw materials and the government its self was still broke, it couldn’t pay anyone anything. it was just printing money with no value.

    certain countries are heading that way. inflation like you see right now is exactly why war is being sought instead of regulation. the companies benifiting right now only care about making the profit line go up as long as possible. investors and CEO’s will just quit/sell the moment it’s about to collapse and then buy up the countries that collapse… it’s really that simple.



  • worse, with modern regulation evidence is erased as it’s created… so much survived WW2 as record keeping was easy to smuggle out and was leaked via word of mouth…

    England nearly gave in to Germany long before the bombs hit english soil, when they were invading France… we can see parallels to that now and our leaders are in lockstep as unlike Germany who’s economic power was in the toilet before the war, the countries in question now based the world’s systems of trade and economy off of them to ensure it would destabilize everyone if something happened…


  • it can be summarised easily as you can see it today as well…

    wealthy individuals with businesses, were afraid of socialism of any kind and backed fascism, even though in the long term it would result in a loss of money as less people to sell products to or need them. as they intend to get as rich as possible, then leave the industry like real life is a game.

    if you can’t see the problem of dissociation at the wealthiest, which has been visible evident since the 2000s starting in the mid 1970s with the first of the post-ww2 generation taking power… it’s easy to lose track of human connection, when you are surrounded by people that only see the vast majority of people as annoying, needy cattle.


  • but that’s the problem, it never would be in place. we knew the risk of lead poisoning before lead was put into fuels. we knew that smog was a biproduct of high concentrations of burning anything.

    citygas existed before petroleum, London was dense with smog 100 years before the first car. “Miasma Lung” was a thing, we understood it. but it was ignored because the East India Trading Company had a conglomerate that had the king’s ear and coin purse.

    why do you think it’s not any different today. in 250 years, nothing has changed. the same people that were a conglomerate in England spread with colonisation, made beurocracy a staple of business.

    all such a law would do is restrict educational research by independents and individuals, while companies continued to use it, to worse and worse outcomes without punishment, as for the same reason petroleum is a issue.

    85% of petroleum use is for commercial traffic, NOT private. ships, trucks, commercial airplanes and manufacturing.

    85% of AI usage is by companies pressing their employees to use it and companies deploying it to replace previously efficient human workflows with innapropriate workflows with LLMs bumbling through it…

    or outright using it where scripts or simple logic gates would work. the problem is and always has been a lack of control over businesses and billionaires. plain and simple.


  • but this was possible before LLMs. face matching and pattern detection dates back to the early 1990s.

    there was a Israeli firm that offered similar services before Palantir existed, it just didn’t get any press.


    deskill like what was already happening due to outsourcing and intentional automation?

    your talking about late-stage capitalism like we weren’t seeing this coming in the 2000s. the moment that Microsoft got out of that antitrust lawsuit under bush spelt the end to independent technological growth and with it comes secular control that leads to what we see today.

    openai and audacity are both perfect examples of when law makers choose to ignore corporate interests in destroying competition and setting presidence.


  • these things are not related however. while AI has made much of it possible, this all traces back to 2016. you can literally watch the cost of living metrics start to rise at a exponential rate starting in 2016, then layoffs in 2020. there was no punishment to companies for being greedy during these times, they have learned the public will just accept anything to get Thier goods and services…

    but your energy use argument falls flat when you look things like the steel industry and even just comparable data workloads and simulations that were being run. yes the power usage is astronomical, but when you consider the scaling of the same afformentioned things, they account for the same amount of power consumption…

    but this wouldn’t even be a issue if nuclear and renewables + batteries were in heavy use instead of ancient coal and gas power plants thanks to lobbying.


  • I agree on alot of your points. all of them underly the major problem in all decision making of this type.

    any complex problem, they ignore everything to achmans razor it into simplicity… when you can’t do that with everything.

    LLMs have benifits, more so local LLMs above all else. decades of “Cloudifying” everything has led to most of the issues they have problems with. power usage for datacenters was always going up to meet the demand of less companies and consumers using local products…

    it’s the whole “there is too many cars on the road” problem. it’s not the cars, it’s that there is a lot of people and this is infrastructure problems.

    but once you move past the ethics you reach the core issue. no one is investing into power grid modernization. if they did that and forced these companies to maintain their own airgapped cooling solutions, it would solve it’s self.