US prepares to funnel more money to military industrial complex.
US prepares to funnel more money to military industrial complex.
“I’ve got a buddy who can do the gas and the 'leccy. Super cheap.”
It turned out really well in NZ when we legalised it.
There’s even a sex workers union.
We still have our share of christofacists and prosperity grifters though, they’re just relatively politically impotent.
Anxiety?
If that tiny idiot of an amygdala in your brain thinks you’re in danger then nausea can be a symptom.
Derp, that’s what I was thinking of.
`Plural of genre. Still should have been singular “genre” though, unless there are multiple genera of these images.
I was thinking of “genus”.
February isn’t in summer.
Yeah, it is.
Someone left their pager in the mine and just fetched it again. Delayed message delivered.
/S
Occam’s razor indeed. Coal mines explode. Or rather, only just barely don’t explode all the time.
I still double-check my CIDR’s/netmasks and expected ranges with a tool (some online one or other). Easier to avoid silly mistakes or typo’s
TL;DR: it depends entirely on the DHCP server software.
Generally the safe/reliable policy is to assign a smaller DHCP range (or ranges) and allocate static assignments outside of the DHCP range(s).
Assume your network is 192.168.1.0/24.
Specify 192.168.1.128/25 for DHCP, which means all DHCP addresses will be above 192.168.1.128.
This leaves you everything below 192.168.1.127 for static assignments.
Extra judicial execution.
Jorkin DePenus Vance asked Democrats to tone down their rhetoric…
…while propagating the cat eating story.
Yeah, I agree that it’s unfair that it underrepresents childless people, and over represents large families.
What annoys me is that a very large portion of the population is disenfranchised (but still taxed in my country). Children have the most to lose, they’re voting with an 80-year view, the oldies are voting with a 5 year view.
As opposed to billionaires just buying politicians?
Parents somehow “taking advantage” isn’t the problem.
It’s not like someone can just pop out 100 children to skew votes.
Being able to treat people as things is pretty much the core of it.
Parents should be allowed a vote on behalf of their children until their children reach whatever age the jurisdiction allows independent voting.
Was it an official act as president?
I think Hilary Clinton said it:
The worst man is still favoured over the best woman.
It’s something like that.
Shhh, don’t tell the SovCits.