• 2 Posts
  • 265 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 22nd, 2024

help-circle



  • In other news, my friend got me to try carrot in his meat and potato pie, and I was all “keep that orange shit off my plate” but he was persistent and I caved and tried it for the first time in a decade (with a big chunk of meat) and I didn’t hate it at all.

    I shouted at him when he fed me “some kind of exotic shredded fruit peel cake, try it, it’s really moist and tasty” and when I liked it admitted it was carrot cake. I shouted a lot, and he just laughed at me and offered me another stupid delicious slice, the git.

    So I think the lesson we all learned is that when I think I can’t possibly be persuaded to try something and that I find the very idea unpleasant, I might well be wrong. Quite, quite wrong.

    So, Jamie, wherever you are these days, sorry. If I had my time over I’d give it a try. The internet agrees with your point about who gives the best head, and I hope you’re happy somewhere with some lucky guy who is indeed having the Jamie “I wouldn’t just blow your dick, I would fucking blow your mind” treatment. Seems stupid in retrospect not to have said yes.

    You did say “call me when you’re drunk and horny enough”. Well, today’s that day, but I don’t have your number and there’s no way I’m involving our parents in a decade-overdue “Does Jamie want to come round to play?”


  • davidagain@lemmy.worldtoGreentext@sh.itjust.worksAnon is straight
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’m a man. I can make myself cum. Therefore, I must be gay.

    Once I did it with my right hand, but I’m left handed, if you know what I mean. You really notice the dick in your hand when you do it that way, I can tell you. I learned some things about myself that day. Things I didn’t tell my homies, despite them all having dicks that I had very much not been thinking about, but which must inevitably have similar fundamental characteristics.













  • davidagain@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneDeltarule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Indeed, indeed.

    No need to apologise for posting c++ in the channel. The programming world owes a lot to Prof. Stroustrup. I enjoyed your reply a great deal.

    You have two choices: firstly, a regular regular attribute, where you can Suckable myThing; and myThing.CheckAndSuck; etc to your heart’s content, and indeed no global variables are being sucked.

    But you can also declare static bool unsucked; and what is a class variable if not a global variable by another name?

    In fact, what is to stop your innocent-sounding accessor method from nuking the filesystem or calling memLeak.recurse();?

    I’m not sure that these things keep you up at night, but you have my sympathy if they do.

    If there was anything I could do to help you relax after a stressful day of multiple inheritance and manual memory management, I would.

    Well, except that of course. I mean, we all draw the line somewhere.

    Unless we’ve had too much to drink or smoked too much weed, in which case boundaries seem less important at the time.

    One time in college, my friend…

    but no, that’s another story for another thread.


  • davidagain@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneDeltarule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Your naming advice is universally good.

    However, if this was a functional programming language, there wouldn’t be any mutable global variables to be unaware were being examined, nor could Suck do any sucking unless it were passed the thing to suck and returned the sucked thing.

    In this way the subtle class of bugs that you both are warning against would be impossible to introduce.

    Depending on the kind of sucking that Suck does, however, you may perceive the global invisibility and availability of the sucking as an advantage in this case. But possibly not if the code is your girlfriend/boyfriend.