![](https://lemm.ee/pictrs/image/42726b93-9fb7-40c8-8fff-f4c8c13ce16e.webp)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/c0e83ceb-b7e5-41b4-9b76-bfd152dd8d00.png)
Yeah that’s a bluff. Google searches surely make up a huge portion of their traffic.
Yeah that’s a bluff. Google searches surely make up a huge portion of their traffic.
A “US-American” if you need to be very clear. But most people just say “American”.
The Julia and Mandelbrot sets always get me. That such a complex structure could arise from such simple rules. Here’s a brilliant explanation I found years back: https://www.karlsims.com/julia.html
Why not?
I have to disagree with this paragraph. That Tailwind enforces a design system is its biggest strength. Having a small selection of colors, font sizes, and padding to choose from is what makes a website feel much more cohesive than one where developers pick arbitrary values every time they style an element.
But you don’t need Tailwind for that; design systems are easy to implement these days using CSS custom properties.
That was true at one point, but reddit has had personalized rankings for a while now. See: https://www.reddit.com/r/changelog/comments/7hkvjn/what_we_think_about_when_we_think_about_ranking
But your point stands; reddit’s earlier ranking methodology was obviously pretty good since it made the site so popular.
Thanks that makes sense. I get why some people are against it, but ranking on your engagement can be super useful imo. Like if I comment on a couple niche communities a lot, I don’t want those to be drowned out by the much larger communities.
Those countries are capitalist. Research the Nordic Model.