![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/88ddea55-9911-4a8e-8d02-cd3eb063042c.webp)
Looks like Intel started with it in 11/2008, AMD in 2011. Long time, but not ‘nearly 20 years.’
Looks like Intel started with it in 11/2008, AMD in 2011. Long time, but not ‘nearly 20 years.’
For REAL!! Not playing same game with one copy makes sense. But the one instance per library was harsh. This is tremendous, and honestly, I’ll probably buy even more games knowing my kids can play them and I can stick to my same old same old if I don’t like it.
Which is why the title was momentarily impressive. Was thinking some ‘in the lab’ demo cpu.
Up until the G in 8700G I totally thought ‘software renderer’ and was hella impressed. So yea, totally plausible it could have been described better.
I mean, if there was more room, it would be indicated with a higher number.
Pecan pie, but I never have room to eat it that day.
They could hash pairs of characters on password creation and store those. Seems like more data points to guess the original password, but maybe the math is hard enough it doesn’t do much.
The intro to #41, Invisibility, has always been a favorite. Don’t need this anymore. Don’t need THIS anymore ‘smacks computer off desk’ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7YdvkSJUjM