BL4CKP1XX13

Yeah no this diagram is fucking awful it’s just the first one I came across.

The consumerists need to get ready with their “cosy cottage core vibes” and their pumpkin-spice lattes.

Sure, but hip thrusts do both too.

You can just about make out it is engaging the butt too, it’s just a poor angle.

One of the moves yes. Hip thrust.

Now this is a real backend developer.

Yes, basically artificial firmware barriers that prevent you or a third-party attempting aftermarket repairs.

It’s a genuine problem for those in rural areas that depend on their machines, farmers typically avoid newer tractors because of this, John Deere is especially bad for it.

For modern cars, when the manufacturer wants a little extra for this month’s performance review so you you gotta take it to the first-party garage as everything is VIN locked.

If Dr. Robotnik did everything but leg day.

Oh look another reason for my “reasons to not buy modern cars” pile.

Those with a supernumery kidney got the Deluxe edition starter pack.

No way burning the lumps of carbon increases the amount of emitted carbon. :surprised_pikachu

Because only a smart president would be insecure enough to put in paranthesis that they have a “High IQ!”

makes sense, thank you!

we all know donnie fantasises about being handled by big strong guys.

wait so when i go to the fridge at 3am for cheese im basically literally eating happiness?

Yes, unfortunately they are, and I do think efficiency is going to be a significant research front for open-weight models. The nature of this topic is highly speculative as our compute capabilities have only recently reached what is required to consider running generative AI models, what we have today are very crude first implementations of what I personally believe will become an everyday tool for developers, and more.

And we have seen this, there are models now capable of running on an individual’s hardware (and not particularly expensive hardware either) that can outperform what ChatGPT initially launched with.

Unfortunately not yet, no, true FOSS models are likely many years away, but I would argue that that follows typical FOSS lifecycles. Emerging technology is typically outperformed by proprietary endeavors, which creates an audience, and then that audience undertakes a FOSS implementation that initially underperforms, then just about competes, then eventually overtakes (i.e, GNU/Linux).

Ah yes, because I own my pair of jeans, or my hoodie, I’m the only person in the world with a pair of jeans and a hoodie…

If the model is adequately FOSS, i.e. open weights, and can run on a single consumer GPU (or NPU), and the “author” (quotations because I’m personally undecided if one can claim code generated by an aforementioned model is theirs) understands it, then I really don’t see what the problem is…

Personally I have nothing against SLMs/LLMs as a technology, to me my grievances against ChatGPT or Claude are mostly about their environmental impacts and selling us back our own art, also keeping knowledge behind a for-profit black-box - if those aren’t appropriate for a specific model, then I say using that model is fair, and good for productivity.