That’s like asking if I can resist reading a book. Sure I could, but I want to read a book - why would I resist?
That’s like asking if I can resist reading a book. Sure I could, but I want to read a book - why would I resist?
Just wait until corporate finds out what the Dutch Krampus looks like 🙈
They actually did:
The Voyager team sent commands over the weekend for the spacecraft to restart the flight data system, but no usable data has come back yet, according to NASA.
Unfortunately, that didn’t help. So now they’ll have to find out what’s causing this, and then see if they can fix it.
Same for translations btw, Firefox didn’t have built-in translations for a while because Mozilla had to painstakingly work on a research project to figure out how to do translation locally, on your machine, without sharing the page you’re looking at with an external server.
Spell-check doesn’t send things to a server in Firefox - that’s Chrome (and only with a particular setting, IIRC).
I’ll emphasise that the “handful of concessions” are concessions to usability, not to having to share data with Google or DuckDuckGo. Firefox is still an incredibly private browser, especially if you consider the rest of the landscape.
Specifically, everyone who’s not using Chrome and its derivates did it. Use Firefox, people.
Ah yes, RDM is a clever workaround for that - I should remember that.
You don’t even need to open Responsive Design Mode - when you select Take Screenshot, there are two buttons “Save visible” and “Save full page” in the top right-hand corner.
Legit one of the most underrated Firefox features that I use all the time: right-click -> Take Screenshot (or Ctrl+Shift+S). No need to look up the relevant node, just hover the relevant part with your cursor.
It’s linked to your account. If you view YouTube without logging in, you should have no issues. You can use the Multi-Account Containers extension to log in selectively per tab, if you need to.
Ah, so blog authors will still need to enable it manually. That’s a shame.
What does “blocked on the search engine” mean?
That doesn’t seem to mention Microsoft Clarity, other than it being on the list of domains that its ad blocker (not its search engine) blocks?
Hehe, I can be more explicit: why would Chromium “resist” MV3 when the Chromium developers are the ones pushing it?