I’m watching the Magicians, on Amazon, and I use subtitles. All the curse words are purposefully filled in with random letters, so as not to offend the reader.
IANAL, but in my opinion this violates the “functionally equivalent services” test of the Americans with Disabilities Act Title IV, and in a just world they would get hit with a massive lawsuit.
Are you talking about drug tests going through customs or for employment?
They only record 44100 times a second, which is discrete and not continuous
I’m gonna guess Keith Haring
“tophat” is toppu hatto but “top hat” is shiruku hatto
Yeah, that was pretty half-baked, lol. I totally agree about domestic titles for foreign movies. To pick another Pixar example, “Ratatouille” is like the perfect punny title, but “Remy’s Delicious Restaurant” is so brain dead it makes me cringe…
I live here, too, and I had a relative visit me from the states. He said the biggest shock was the information density of signage, so it’s not just websites lol. Living here it has become invisible to me, but him telling me that made want to formulate a theory, something like: separate from literacy rates, literate people in Japan are somehow more literate than their literate counterparts in the US, so designers trust their audience not to be overwhelmed by high information density. On the other hand, websites and signage in the US look clean and sleek and simple to the point of feeling dumbed-down.
It’s almost as if wishing death on people is some sort of red flag…
You should get that checked out
Tom Hanks Guillermo Racias 阿部 利賀藤 Dieter Anke
Like a duck!
Does quattro formaggi count?
Drug users: “Welcome to the club!”
Quoth the Raven, “Trevor Moore.”
I don’t have shy bladder, my urethra just looks like one of those crazy straws with all the loop-da-loops, just takes a while make it to the exit
Thanks, that’s a good one one. I was wondering where exactly you disagreed with the previous definition, and that’s reasonable.
Not trying to gotcha or anything, I just think it’s fun, but niacin is an example of a substance that is a nutrient but can also produce a drug effect (“niacin flush”) when taken in large (non-nutritive) quantities.
So for me personally, whether something is a drug or not depends less on the identity of the substance, and more on the specific interaction with the organism, and what effect is most salient to observers. I don’t have a pithy definition handy, though.
What’s wrong with Trust On First Use?