“Everyone that disagrees with me is bad”

You’re in your own home instance. If the vast majority is disagreeing with you and your home instance has nothing to say you might consider reevaluating your position.

…ah. here it is.

See previous comment about golden parachutes and implosion of organization.

Yours is the same logic used to sue companies instead of people.

This is feeling petulant so I’m taking my step out now. Hope you find the joy you’re looking for, but seeing as you noted earlier that you live in the USA and noting the instance you’re posting from, I suspect you know all about what will be coming around the corner for trans people should the states be allowed to implode on itself.

Inequivalent. Jeffrey Dahmer was an individual. My argument was on organizations that the guilty individuals had already left.

This is like being happy an evil company is going under while the CEO and their cronies have already taken their golden parachute on the next project.

Like… Nothing’s changed. The entity is not a person. Nothing has been stopped. If anything they were just allowed to get away with it, while the suffering of everyone affected remains.

You’re allowed to be happy, but you’re naive to think this is the end of anything… Or even a push in a positive direction. No one’s going to let you have that narrative when it’s presented openly.

Self imploding genocidal states are not generally replaced by better people.

Haven’t really seen you address this anywhere and it gives the appearance that your intentionally arguing in bad faith.

You’re going to have difficulty finding an audience to sit there and listen to you celebrate something that will actively bring more suffering to others than the current status quo.

Do you think it’s downfall would be brought down by someone better?

This is depressingly naive…

It’s interesting you seem to think that exploitation will… Slow down?

Lol

This is what the phrase “can’t see past their nose” looks like. OP has correctly identified a problem, and identified the fault. They just haven’t internalized the wide reaching effects of a total dismantling.

This is not something that’s going to be good for people like you’re hoping. This is going to hurt a lot, and if history is to believed it won’t be replaced by the people who share your views. It’ll be another future fascist government.

o7

The scientific method

I’ve spent a lot of today thinking about this.

How do you stay in any system that relies on this type of insurance to operate?

I could never be a part of a church doing this, Even if I was religious.

Do people just not know? Would it matter?

How is this a thing???

There’s no way…

Edit:

Here are a few examples of insurance companies that offer molestation insurance, specifically tailored for churches and religious organizations:

1. Church Mutual Insurance Company: This company provides a range of insurance products for religious organizations, including sexual misconduct liability insurance. They offer coverage for legal defense costs, settlements, and other expenses related to allegations of sexual abuse or molestation.

2. GuideOne Insurance: GuideOne specializes in insurance for churches and nonprofit organizations. They offer sexual misconduct liability coverage as part of their comprehensive church insurance packages, helping protect against claims of sexual abuse.

3. Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company: Brotherhood Mutual offers insurance products designed for churches and ministries, including coverage for sexual misconduct liability. Their policies can help cover legal expenses, settlements, and other costs associated with sexual abuse allegations.

4. Philadelphia Insurance Companies: Philadelphia Insurance Companies provides specialized insurance solutions for religious organizations, including coverage for sexual misconduct and molestation. They offer policies that cover legal defense, settlements, and related costs.

5. ChurchWest Insurance Services: ChurchWest provides insurance solutions for churches and religious institutions, including sexual misconduct liability insurance. Their policies are designed to protect organizations from the financial and reputational damage that can result from such claims.

These companies offer tailored policies that address the unique risks faced by religious organizations, providing financial protection and support in the event of allegations of sexual misconduct. It’s important for churches to work with an experienced insurance broker or agent to ensure they have the appropriate coverage in place.

What in the unholy fuck.

Late night show

Aight lmk when we’re “all” ready I guess and I’ll go right after you. /s

No one wants to be the vanguard

Elder abuse