So what are his density extremes based on this? (I am too lazy and hungry to do that calculation right now. Besides, just because I know he was “smaller than a temple” does not mean I know the likely size of that temple to get a true volume bound…)

Hey!

Seems to be working for the current generation of AI primitives used…

Wait “which took 9 years to resolve.” isn’t the linked ticket resolved as “won’t fix”‽

Did they change enough that it no longer happens thereby fixing it indirectly? Or do they no longer care that it might confuse users?

Yes, and I was talking about the practice of some AI companies buying books in bulk to feed to their LLMs en masse which sometimes/often destroys the book in the process.

I was trying to build a bridge between those two related topics to “justify” the mistake and make it an intentional remark instead.

Well given the waves of “buy book, scan, scrap” scrappers might become an acceptable version as well soon.

More like the difference between a circle with radius r >> 0 vs a point.

It was supposed to be another math pun about a line being 1 dimensional (at least it only requires a single parameter) with a point being 0D and the fact that “deep” conversations could be said to be multi-dimensional.

Didn’t they just talk about circling back, not back into itself?

Don’t you drop a dimension from this deep conversation!

Hey no kink shaming in the guild!

Right?

It’s also super important to make sure people get the fact that they aren’t just one but two drugs!

Right, I did see your name somewhere, but I no longer remember the exact community. Anyway you are now and forever tagged “suddenly: mod” in my client!

I want to hear you say that at one of the conferences/meetings of scientists I could witness live.

Some would tell you “yeah that’s obvious, we just need to look in these and those parameter spaces to find out!”

While others would tell you you are blinded by glory or whatever and cannot accept that we do not understand gravity because we think there’s mass there but really it’s just another correction term.

And some would spin off wildly into other directions…

So yes we have observed an effect and dark matter is a possible solution. But it’s not the consensus name for the effect as there are many camps which simply do not need matter (neither dark nor any other kind) as an explanation.

Which, in English, sounds like some cyberpunk band or organisation!

I never thought about it and instantly wanted to reply “wait why can’t you do that‽” but now that I thought about it, what would you want the history to look like in that case? A slightly weird rebase? A single commit which seemingly copy pasted the entire other branch with no relation to it left behind?

Becoming a mod. You still have time to save hundreds!

Oh I know a place that is/was like this but with tiny (or not so tiny) T-Rex figures due to naming things.

Dinosaurs, ey?

(Quick edit: As I am not close enough to biology this statement may be incorrect as chickens may not technically belong to the category [whichever level and correct name it may be/have] of dinosaur. In this case I am sorry for perpetrating this misinformation)

Also no encoded basic auth or raw ip addresses (not that a useful website would likely use raw ipv4 or 6 since that causes huge CORS and sometimes even DNS issues…)

Sadly, and I am not a lawyer so this is not even close to legal advice(!!), “beginning” is potentially the wrong word when talking about licenses due to copyright. Because even a single flipped bit in RAM on your computer could be constructed as a copyright infringement if pushed in a legal battle and decided in a court. (This all sounds squishy because, again, I am not a lawyer and as far as I know nothing of this sort has had clear ground setting or breaking rulings yet…)

Why am I of this opinion despite also usually loving to take the “my device my rules stance”? Because I got to proof read some final exams for legal professionals-to-be for their technical accuracy and let me tell you: the most likely legal outcome they saw was not good for most of us. (So now I really really hope that some high up court rules on a case like this and sides with “common sense” about what is and is not allowed with our owned hardware!)

Yeah no I wouldn’t bet on the concrete market right now. Carbon taxes will likely continue to put a damper on those.

Better bet on the fictitious market, I head there’s some great sci-fi and general fantasy about to be released.

(Sorry, I just had to make that joke right now to vent)

Well the iron and slime I can get you, but the redstone I have struggled with for many years and I still do not possess any…