For me, it would have to be the guy in WWII who supposedly saved Hitler’s life as a child while at the beach and had his life supposedly spared during the holocaust in return (since the person was Jewish). Like bro, the culprit of a mass genocide isn’t going to remember that, somehow stalk his files, pinpoint who he is, single him out, and go the effort to save him. That’s sadly not how a genocide works. When you’re genocidal, most likely you sadly don’t care about those things, especially when soldiers are doing your dirty work. This was always a common story in WWII videos and it’s very deceptive when you think about it, especially when you consider Neo-Nazis would share the story specifically to make Hitler sound like he had some kind of honor (spoiler alert, he didn’t, he was an extreme form of a genocidal maniac).

Such stories should be filtered by more investigative peoples out of public discourse, they’re traps.

I didn’t interpret it that way, but I guess that might be misleading when I think about it.

Not even in the title?

No. I just did the age-old tradition in this community of seeing something, posting it, and accepting if I had to be corrected if something was wrong about it. Was something wrong about it?

but in return they won’t be allowed to talk about it

This is a new feature of the justice system I haven’t seen before. Wouldn’t this amount to CCP-style censorship?

https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/13l47d9/eli5_what_exactly_is_sealioning/

Wow then, kind of overestimated how many people care about the modlogs. Fair enough.

It’s self-deprecating fourth-wall-breaking commentary on fediverse culture. Have you never been accused of sealioning when questioning someone’s lack of a source?

It would put all the infighting in some of these communities into perspective.