Slop

Yes, because “they’re eating the dogs”, basically.

Facebook boomers and edgy incel youths.

The bird ir glad.

deleted by creator

Squirt is just pee and is stored in the balls.

Good. Less money for Americans who voted for him or didn’t show up to vote against him.

Slopux? LLLinux?

Doesn’t ring as well as Microslop, but we’ll get there.

Which of the male influencers you follow taught you this?

We put asbestos back in the bag.

Saying that is defatism spread by useful idiots. “AI” is just software (which, hilariously, isn’t even close to AI). It’s not “here to stay”, because it’s not “here”.

We had heat-seaking, radar, face/shape-recognition with computer vision for years. Current “AI” brings nothing to the table that couldn’t be achieved earlier. Maybe a more intuitive human-computer interface, and even that is a dubious.

ML is different, and it has been “out of the bag” for a long time, but nobody batted an eye.

A lot of short kings don’t have this issue.

If you’re a taller dude, not only do you get backsplash on the floor, but on your legs as well.

You either have to piss straight into the water which is just an obnoxious sound, or you piss on the porcelain and get backsplash.

If you dont believe me, pour some water into a cup normally, and pour some water into a cup from 30cm higher.

Religious people are all nuts, just the degree varies a little bit.

Actual High-T, low-E build: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-27-yr-old-male-with-aromatase-deficiency-with-permission-of-the-patient-to-reproduce_fig5_11005642

Glass = heavy. More transport pollution, more manufacturing pollution.

While glass is high in recyclability, all hinges on where it’s coming from and where it’s going (to be recycled).

Best container is the one you can bring from home.

You’re discounting transportation and manufacturing (energy) costs.

Reusable only works if it’s manufactured fairly locally and actually gets recycled, which a lot of stuff doesn’t, even if it’s made from glass or metal.

We need to move away from packaging altogether.

Bring-your-own-container is the only way.

A fact is something that can be proven.

“I love my wife” is the truth, but it’s not a fact, since we can’t really measure “love”.

At some point in the future, we will have AI that is more generally useful than current LLMs. If and when we have truly general purpose AI, it could benefit humanity in countless ways

– You. Just now.

Nice goalpost move.

“In the future, “AI” will be a completely different technology”.

Lol, why do I even bother discussing things with techbros… Spare the “insults” part, you’re the one who started that.

Wow, I’m very impressed. Reads like billionaire’s wiki page.

Analogy absolutely works. The pig could not walk when it was born, now it can. Which means that next year it’ll fly.

Exactly the same type predictions are advertised for LLMs. It can’t count to 10, but a text predictor will be able to find cure for cancer.

If you’re as smart as you claim you are, you’d go read a few papers on the limitations of the technology as a whole. “It will get better” / “It’s in its infancy” is just pure bullshit. There will be optimizations and gains here and there. But the core technology is not capable of producing what is being promised.

Pig will not fly, I’m affraid, even though it might be able to make do a hop next year.

It seems that youre just a really dumb and uneducated person. I feel bad for you.

Now that we’ve got ad-hominems out of the way, let’s get back on the topic.

Damn, I really thought I explained the self-driving thing, but it just bounced off you, didn’t it. Reaping the effects of AI so soon, huh.

If we only ever evaluated technology on its present state of being, we wouldn’t have planes for instance. That’s not a really sound methodology. “It doesn’t work now. Therefore, it should be abandoned.” Like, what?

If you think that’s how design and engineering works, you’re either 12, or really into LLMs.

Look, I’ll put it really simply for you. I know that if I throw a ball forwards, it will land in front of me. I call predict it, and I can calculate it. It’s based on established laws of physics.

If people, who want to sell me a pig, tell me it’s going to fly next year after I buy it, based on the fact that it learned to walk, that is not a prediction based “on sound methodology”.

Enjoy your slop, it’s not going to get any better, and it’s going to get ALOT more expensive very soon. That’s a prediction, after evaluating current technology.

Wow, even a personal anecdote! That’s, like, irrefutable! (since you didn’t really understand what I’m saying, I’ll clarify - this was a Musk/Tesla reference)

Listen, next year I’m curing cancer and solving world hunger, thus making ““AI”” obsolete. Care to invest?

Until then, it’s best if we evaluate technology at its current standing. Which is garbage generator that requires way too much resources.