No. I’m saying that if you think you’re normal, you’re normal. If you think you’re abnormal, then you’re conscious to your abnormality, which makes you normal
No. I’m saying that if you think you’re normal, you’re normal. If you think you’re abnormal, then you’re conscious to your abnormality, which makes you normal
What you are referring to is called implicit bias. It’s the automatic differentiation of tribal heritage. It’s honestly a phenomenon that can’t be controlled. You spend enough time with a certain people, then you are going to prefer that people. IMO that’s why we should drop the cultural walls and just amalgamate
You’re not the only one like though. Please don’t try use my like against me
I never processed that this is how it works. You just blew my mind
So are you saying that people who sweat more in hot environments are better suited for long distance hunting? Because I’m a gross, sweaty mofo and I would like to feel better about it
My jetta has 120 degree view camera, but 180 degree object sensor, and the sensor literally screams at you before the camera can even process the visuals
You’re normal because you aren’t the only one like
Normalcy is a catch-22. If you’re aware enough to identify you’re abnormal, and are aware of normal, then you have the competency to be normal which makes you normal. But if you say you’re normal and you’re really abnormal, then you’re also normal because it’s normal to identify yourself as the normal
Putin still has more toys in the toy box, so he’s not worried how many get broken
Did you long rest to prepare for the fight before you encountered him. You hit points of no return in the game and they don’t tell you about them
When backing into a spot, you can predict that there shouldn’t be anything behind you. But you should always check your blind spots. I kind of cheat though because I have a backup camera
When you back into a spot, you have way more visibility leaving than you would backing out
What’s your take?
Red Vs. Blue and Age of Empires 4
People are strange
It’s meant to be a like minded agreement where if it ever came down to the countries going to war with each other, then the agreement is how war would be conducted. Take the Geneva Convention for example. If the US went to war with England for some reason, then the Geneva convention would be their ultimate code of conduct for the war to avoid unnecessary casualties, the management of pows and adequate reasons for ceasefires. It’s more just guidelines as they are rules. However if you’re a country outside of those agreements, then the guidelines don’t apply. It seems arbitrary, but the concept comes from a good place imo
BRINGIN IT BACK!!!
SATA: “what is my purpose?”
Me: “you store volatile memory”
SATA: “Oh my God!”
Thanks Baron Von Buzzkill