Ah that makes sense
Ah that makes sense
Is there something wrong with beehaw?
And with it’s ability to just spit out garbage misinformation with unmatched speed.
Potentially privacy? Like only you can see your screen. But that’s also a downside if you want to show someone something
Yeah but because Wikipedia articles, to an extent, ephemeral it is good practise to use the sources at the bottom of the article as your source, rather than the Wikipedia article itself. It makes finding the origin of the information easier.
If it is something more permanent like a paper or a published article, then that doesn’t suffer from the same issues
Police chief wants excuse to look at illegal material
Ploopy have given trackball enthusiasts a lot more choice at least!
IIYAMA make DSDs that are 4K, although I know that’s not a requirement for OP, so that should be able to replace a TV pretty well
Oooo I hadn’t heard of Niagara launcher before. It looks really beautiful!
I’m on an Asus UX410U and he’s been going well for 7 years. I’ll probably need to replace it this year or next year as the screen is starting to go, but I feel 7 years is pretty good.
What’s wrong with it?
Never heard of planet computers until you mentioned the Cosmo Communicator. Their products look really cool!
Wait, do people genuinely defend moves like this?
It’s frustrating because there are a few people I like, like John Green, who are on threads but not the rest of the fediverse
What is shady about Ghostery?
Retractions are important in case issues with the method are found after publication. For example, if it turns out a piece of equipment was improperly calibrated and so the results can’t be trusted, a retraction of any work based on those results would be expected.
Wait what happened?!