Both?

I thought Veritasium was a Harry Potter spell but apparently I should have already known and watched a YouTube video before posting my silly thoughts.

Word! That’s cool

I don’t know how relevant this is but I heard human eyes are very good at picking shades of green out. Maybe mammals are generally good at spotting greens and so hiding as a green thing doesn’t work as well. Just a guess though

Didn’t they not get along great before John got got?

Maybe they reuse the bags. Bag up 5th Street, salt it, collect the bags and prep 6th.

Definitely drink milk from the bottom of your bag though, that’s fine and normal.

When a piece of content that doesn’t allow downvotes, like a tweet, has lots more reposts than it does likes, the “ratio” is seen as proof the opinion was disagreed with, proportionally to the “ratio” itself.

It’s only ever those specific things, because if society actually LIKED or WANTED those things anymore they’d be doing them and it wouldn’t need to be “conserved”.

Oh, you want to keep your traditional folk dance or scarf or goat-herding technique? Great! Those damned melting pot liberals love that stuff. They eat it up. They want more cultures to explore. What they don’t want is to be told they’re going to hell for who they love, or that child labor is good or any of the other insane things “conservatives” want to conserve.

You can argue about what was fer supper yesterday but that don’t make tuna casserole into brisket and baked taters. The states that became the Confederacy started the war, and the war was about slavery, or states rights to do slavery if you prefer the obtuse phrasing.

You’re again correct, they use a lovely little modifier we call in English “And”. It lets you do two things as one thing. So you can legalize something, and regulate it, in one legislative action. But you couldn’t regulate something, and then legalize it, because if the government is regulating something they’ve defacto legalized it. If it’s illegal it can’t be regulated because the only regulation allowed for illegal things is “none at all ever”.

Yeah, correct. But you can’t implement that framework on anything until it is legalized. It can be your very next action. But the lawful government cannot, by definition regulate illegal activity, so first you pass one legal motion and then you do the next. That doesn’t mean you can’t have a plan for move 2 before you make move 1.

What does this part of conservativism that you subscribe to seek to conserve? How is it not in line with American conservativism?

It can’t be regulated until it’s legalized. Once it is it should be.

That’s a great teacher. Refusing to teach a technology only leads to poor use. Even if one thinks it’s a poor technology, teach THAT instead of just black boxing the topic. The bottle is open, the genie is out. Better to teach how to make legally airtight wishes than to ban wishmaking.

“clearly wasn’t”

I see now, you just phrase things abruptly in a way that SEEMS rude but clearly isn’t. My mistake. Have a nice day.

Fair enough.

Not sure why you phrased that as correcting them when you were agreeing and adding to it.

Superman could do it. Spiderman could not.

The part where you assumed something southern also had to be racist was where you accidentally revealed your own prejudice. People may be noting the irony approaching hypocrisy.