To choose order over disorder, or disorder over order, is to accept a trip composed of both the creative and the destructive. But to choose the creative over the destructive is an all-creative trip composed of both order and disorder. To accomplish this, one need only accept creative disorder along with, and equal to, creative order, and also willing to reject destructive order as an undesirable equal to destructive disorder.
The Curse of Greyface included the division of life into order/disorder as the essential positive/negative polarity, instead of building a game foundation with creative/destructive as the essential positive/negative. He has thereby caused man to endure the destructive aspects of order and has prevented man from effectively participating in the creative uses of disorder. Civilization reflects this unfortunate division.
THE CURSE OF GREYFACE AND THE INTRODUCTION OF NEGATIVISM - Principia Discordia
He’s Weyland.
an eight-year-old girl was among those killed
Hop on Adobe stock right now and search for something. Half of the results will be AI-generated. There’s a search filter that can exclude them.
As a human bot in b2b marketing, the dark arts are antithetical to learning. To market is to forget.
I kinda assume the internet is just the same 200 dudes from Sensible Erection migrating from platform to platform.
I think this is accurate. But I’d like to restate it.
The Left (as the apparent big tent party full of literal minorities) has been learning to deal with disenfranchisement and the feeling “that their anguish is belittled as a personal failure, and often downright mocked” for its entire existence. Because of a huge variety of factors, the Right is losing some of its influence. They are not handling this well. The Left (being well acquainted with feeling unheard) should have been able to help the Right through this transition. Due to deep seated insecurities on both sides, we are no longer able to help one another as a people. Buckle up.
Is it Elmo?
deleted by creator
The in-network healthcare providers don’t trust my employer’s insurer. So much so, they require full payment up front. At this point, I don’t know what in-network even means. I no longer buy it.
Calling what attention transformers do memorization is wildly inaccurate.
*Unless we’re talking about semantic memory.
It honestly blows my mind that people look at a neutral network that’s even capable of recreating short works it was trained on without having access to that text during generation… and choose to focus on IP law.
The issue is that next to the transformed output, the not-transformed input is being in use in a commercial product.
Are you only talking about the word repetition glitch?
How do you imagine those works are used?
It’s called learning, and I wish people did more of it.
This is an inaccurate understanding of what’s going on. Under the hood is a neutral network with weights and biases, not a database of copyrighted work. That neutral network was trained on a HEAVILY filtered training set (as mentioned above, 45 terabytes was reduced to 570 GB for GPT3). Getting it to bug out and generate full sections of training data from its neutral network is a fun parlor trick, but you’re not going to use it to pirate a book. People do that the old fashioned way by just adding type:pdf to their common web search.
You’ve made a lot of confident assertions without supporting them. Just like an LLM! :)