ⓝⓞ🅞🅝🅔

Let go and let entropy. 🌌

  • 6 Posts
  • 148 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 16th, 2023

help-circle

  • Why is this number so drastically higher than other numbers I’ve seen? I thought it was in the 40 thousands?

    (Not like that’s any better. Genocide is genocide. I’m just a bit perturbed by how different the number is then when I last heard.)

    UPDATE: Further along in the linked document it clarified…

    “In total it is likely that 62,413 people have died of starvation and its compilations in Gaza from October 7, 2023 to September 30, 2024. Most of these will have been young children.”

    That figure is an addition to the 42,000 that have died from the violence.

    Holy hell… 😭


















  • I’d love for him to give this some attention. It’s been mentioned for quite a while. A couple channels just added a new bot which uses spoiler tags to hide excessive information. now it makes these ridiculously huge comments for every single post…

    This is what it looks like for me on Boost: Sample of the bot comments

    Would love love love to see markdown support updated particularly for spoiler tags.




  • I found the wiki article helpful. Perhaps you will as well.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_panic_defense

    The gay panic defense or homosexual advance defence is a victim blaming strategy of legal defense, which refers to a situation in which a heterosexual individual charged with a violent crime against a homosexual (or bisexual) individual claims they lost control and reacted violently because of an unwanted sexual advance that was made upon them. A defendant will use available legal defenses against assault and murder, with the aim of seeking an acquittal, a mitigated sentence, or a conviction of a lesser offense. A defendant may allege to have found the same-sex sexual advances so offensive or frightening that they were provoked into reacting, were acting in self-defense, were of diminished capacity, or were temporarily insane, and that this circumstance is exculpatory or mitigating.

    This has no bearing on the admitted facts or evidence. The goal is to prevent the defense from basically saying, “They deserved it because they were gay/trans, and that surprised/scared me so much I acted violently.” It’s like saying you punched someone because they were wearing a different colored shirt. It’s not okay to hurt someone because of who they are.

    The law was passed to prevent victim blame and to make it clear that being gay/trans isnt scary. People are people. And violence isn’t okay, even if one’s bigotry causes them act irrationally.

    EDIT: Updated to simplify what I was trying to convey