![](https://forkk.me/pictrs/image/255a1f21-a8d2-4841-9024-c55d6cd3a71c.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
17·
1 year agoBlame Disney
Blame Disney
I’m sure most are already aware of it, but to get around it they’d have to lock part of the article behind a “load more” button that requires JS (or even just auto-load it via JS without a button), which I have seen some do.
There must be a reason it’s not done universally though. Maybe because it’d break archives? Not sure
Firefox already supported ublock origin on mobile and a handful of other extensions. This is just them opening it up to more extensions.
Disabling JavaScript seems to work in most cases. Not sure why that isn’t listed higher up on here
Cool, now let’s do it federally, and make it an actual crime and not just civil liability.
From https://www.macrumors.com/2023/07/26/ios-17-beta-action-button-iphone-15-pro/