Really not much of a podcast person, but my favorite has to be the Stronger by Science podcast.
Really not much of a podcast person, but my favorite has to be the Stronger by Science podcast.
If one of the two sessions is cardio, then it’s not too bad. But yeah, lifting weights twice a day would be extremely difficult to recover from.
Mostly all the natural beauty and the low cost of living.
I visited for a few months and loved it.
power goes out 12 times a week, water’s on for only 5 hours a week, internet drops out every 2 hours, (only alternate option is musky),
I visited for 2 months the only one of these I experienced was the internet going out once.
no cops, no fire dept, no schools
That’s just not true at all.
trash is just piled up with no plan whatsoever,
I’m from NYC, so I guess I’m just used to trash.
no public transit
That’s true, but apartments in the middle of the city are so cheap that most things were within walking distance for me.
more superfund sites per sq mile than any state,
I’ve never looked at this when deciding where to live, but I just looked it up and there are way more within 50 miles of me than there are in all of Puerto Rico.
more taxes than in the USA
Still way cheaper cost of living than where I live.
hurricanes, earthquakes and narcos.
Those are the only things you mentioned that are an actual concern to me. Since I work remotely, I’d have the luxury of leaving temporary if there was a massive natural disaster.
I’ve been thinking of Puerto Rico.
Everything on the planet eats everything else on the planet.
I believe that’s called the appeal to nature fallacy. Something happening in nature doesn’t mean it’s morally right. Lions often commit infanticide, but that obviously doesn’t make it okay for humans to do.
Most wouldn’t be alive anyway if they weren’t grown for food.
That would be much better than breeding billions of animals and putting them under the conditions we do, just because people like how they taste.
Those 100 people would still be eating 90% as many animals as they were before. People don’t need to eat animals to live, so expecting praise for eating 10% less is pretty funny.
It’d be like a criminal deciding to decrease the amount of crimes he commits by 10% and expecting people to encourage and praise him.
Vegans don’t eat animals for the sake of the animals, because they believe killing them unnecessarily is morally wrong.
Saying you’re only going to eat animals once a day is like saying you’re going to halve the amount of violent crimes you commit and expecting praise for it.
Pretty sure that’s not it. People are saying removed as a joke. It’s a filter for slurs, not swears.
Someone who exclusively ate meat for some reason who moved to chicken would have a greater impact than someone who exclusively ate chicken and went vegan.
But that first person could have an even bigger environmental impact by becoming Vegan instead of only eating chicken.
If they just sit around and you don’t play them, I’d probably just sell them. Emulating is so much more convenient.
But who cares what I’d do? Your life is your own. If collecting retro games brings you joy, then go for it.
The article is click bait, I agree. I’m referring to OP’s post, though. Not the entire article.
Did you not read the post?
This might sound like an ad, but I always keep Aquaphor in my bag. I go rock climbing which gives me really dry hands and Aquaphor helps with that so much
Are you fine with cam?
The upside seems pretty clear? It’s a free 55" TV. A lot of people won’t care that it’s not as good as other TVs.
Pokemon Emerald
If you want to minimize plant death, going vegan is still the right move.
Most of the crops we grow go to feeding animals that people eat.
Telegram isn’t e2e encrypted.