Isn’t signal open source though? I know being open source doesn’t magically make it interoperable with other services but even if Signal or Whisper systems sell out, someone could just fork the projects
How are biometrics fundamentally insecure?
Yeah I thought the complaints about iOS were a bit weird as well. It seemed like they didn’t like that smartphones got more capable. Of course there’s going to be a million apps and a million settings when (as you put it) consumers increasingly expect their devices to do everything
I don’t mind ads as long as they’re not following me around. Show me ads based on the community that I’m browsing or something if you want better targeting
Whoa whoa whoa, that’s Momazon, a company that resembles but is legally distinct from Amazon
That one’s hard for me to read and I’m not even dyslexic!
X is the name of a windowing system used in a lot of Unix-like operating systems
The API is going through code review right now!
“All bleeding eventually stops”
The problem I have with this view is that AI “reading” a book is not the same as you or I reading. It doesn’t actually learn it’s just predicting the most likely sequence of words to be a response to whatever prompt it receives. In that sense, the words are just data, not actual words. Given how valuable data is in this day and age, I think it makes perfect sense for OpenAI to have to either: only use public domain/authorized works, or pay the creators for their work.
And the effects will be
While the effects you list don’t seem entirely implausible, you’re stating these hypothetical situations as if they are already fact and we have evidence to indicate that. I agree with @substill in that I don’t see Threads being a threat to small communities.
Wow whiteboy7thst now that’s a name I haven’t heard in a LONG time