

Agreed. That’s why I believe that all business applications of AI should be taxed, and those funds redistributed to the populace. Everyone conceivably contributed, therefore everyone should benefit.


Agreed. That’s why I believe that all business applications of AI should be taxed, and those funds redistributed to the populace. Everyone conceivably contributed, therefore everyone should benefit.


Isn’t it? That’s one opinion, sure.


A downvote implies your contribution has no merit - why bother offering something that others will not value? It’s pretty simple.


The nose is so wrong, and the shadows from it makes her seem to have five o’clock shadow.


I’m probably alone in really liking the results. The hair is especially impressive, and I like the translucency effect on the dreamcatcher style hair adornment. The lipstick seems unnecessary but I have to admit it does make the characters seem more lifelike to have some delineation compared to the mono colored face skin textures.
I don’t understand… Were you afraid the cameras would capture her soul?


No artist’s work is being directly used. It’s like arguing that artists owe Disney or Studio Ghibli money if they learned from watching their animations.


… But there are three…


Defenses get downvotes. Ask me how I know.


Yes, because the AI generated the game in a bubble, with no direction by a person. It’s just constantly spitting out games of its own volition with no input from people.
/s


It’s hilarious, right? Said as someone on solar array power who uses local models.


Welcome to the party, fellow rational person. Enjoy the AI-hate mob that is Lemmy!
Psst… It’s Dunning-Kruger.


The key word you’re looking for is “abliterated”
Or he’s actually keeping up with the news.
I assumed they meant their own comment.


This comment is obviously AI.
Accurate.