Including humans. I’m not going near the person launching pinecones at my head from their yard.
Including humans. I’m not going near the person launching pinecones at my head from their yard.
Why are we quoting each other? I remember the comment before yours. I made it. Idiot.
Because quoting in a response provides structure to the response that improves readability.
Also, you are posting on a publicly accessible forum, not having a one-on-one conversation. In that context, that fact that you may remember what you said doesn’t mean that it’s not beneficial to repeat it for others.
The “idiot” comment was unnecessarily rude where someone was engaging in what appeared to be a good faith response, and only brings down the tone of your entire post.
The article has a paragraph later on that says:
In rejecting the plaintiffs’ claims for damages, the court said, “It cannot be said that discussions at the Diet…regarding provisions not allowing same-sex marriage are clearly in violation of the Constitution.”
I suspect the plaintiffs are only appealing that aspect of the judgment.
All dinosaurs are lesser to spinosaurus.
Forge Exquisite Armour Reproductions
Have you also been forgetting to covert votes to metric before you send them?
For reference:
1 upvote = 2.2 nah yeahs
1 downvote = 2.2 yeah nahs
It charges up during the day like one of those glow in the dark stickers, obviously.
Breath of the Wild and Tears of the Kingdom were both great games, with good story (if a little cutesy, but it’s aimed at being family friendly), not even really any allusion to sex.
A bit yes and no with TOTK I think.
You are right that TOTK doesn’t have any explicit sex or romance. But the way the introductory cut scenes for Purah and Riju deliberately start from their legs and pan up over their bodies doesn’t really have a purpose other than to sexualise them and announce “look how hot we’ve made these characters for you.”
The thought of seeing someone shouting “Train!” still gives me nostalgia.