Why would they investigate without a complaint.
But back to my main point, even if he was libelled (he wasn’t) he wouldn’t win anything in the UK. The whole point of the legal action is to try and silence anything critical of the regime and the only way that can be successful is under us law.
That is true but trump had several months of complaining about it when he could have bought a claim but didn’t. In any case there’s no incentive to claim in UK because there would be nothing to win, except he might get his legal fees back (but even that isn’t guaranteed).
Unfortunately the case is being heard in Miami, Florida.
… because under UK (English) law you can only claim damages for actual harm which is basically zero.
Yes they do.
Ah, this explains why Trump is getting so angry that UK and Europe won’t deploy carriers to the middle east!
Leroy Jenkins brushing off his CV
Maybe educate yourself?
European auto makers and not sbubsidised to the same extent and in fact most subsidies are illegal under EU trading rules. Even in domestic markets we have to pay tax on new EV purchases, typically 20 percent.
Chinese government support of ev manufacturers has been massive and is contributing to their unsustainable national debt (that and building massive infrastructure that can’t be used because they are falling down).
It’s well documented, here’s one of many articles:
China signals it will pull plug on subsidies for EVs with five-year plan exclusion - https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/china-signals-it-will-pull-plug-subsidies-evs-with-five-year-plan-exclusion-2025-10-29/
The CSIS research based on the business filings and Chinese government reports puts the subsidy at between 28 and 32 percent depending on the manufacturer and target market.
This is all part of China’s strategy to basically undercut the opposition for long enough that they will go bankrupt.
What will happen when there is no competition? Well, you only have to look at the current prices of computer components for the answer to that.
Is it the reading or the comprehension you are struggling with?
Either way I’m sure when you finish school you will understand.
Removed by mod
Adverts for BY D own products are still adverts.
Truth hurts?
Ok you do you.
Removed by mod
I leased a BYD seal for the last few weeks as an extended test drive and it has adverts on the screen you use to change the climate control so…
Right now BYD are being so heavily subsidised by the Chinese government that they are imported into the US and Europe at less than production and shipping cost.
Believe me when I say that as soon as they have enough market share they will be doing this, and because china are hyper-capitalist when it comes to exports it will be more intrusive and more inconvenient.
You can only install Graphene on a Google phone and there’s two big issues with that:
True. In fairness I don’t play them so I wasn’t aware how widespread anti cheat is. I occasionally play Apex legends which forces cross play on console and the pc gamers have kernel level anti cheat but it’s very obvious they are cheating. It would be a fun console game if it wasn’t for that.
Edit to say that like me you can simply choose not to play those games.
Counterpoint: cheating is now so widespread on multiplayer pc games that they are basically unplayable.
It’s the main reason I still play console for multiplayer.
This is specifically only for cloud services provided by e.g. Amazon to financial institutions.
It’s an extension of existing powers already applied to the companies that handle financial data.
So… Not only is the BoE the right people to to it, they are probably the only people with the expertise to do it.
I’ve given you all the stats but you obviously aren’t reading them. Or do you not understand?
Now you have a choice. Be a better person and apologize or continue to be a toxic fuck.
I’ve spelled it out to you and provided sources. Where you so resistant to evidence?
Are you a bigot?
…and yet the offending clips were broadcast in full on national tv less than 12 months before trump sued, and the full documentary available to view on iPlayer within that 12 month period (I literally only watched it on iPlayer because of the controversy)
Regardless, under UK law the time limit can be increased if you only become aware of the libel after the deadline has passed.