More if you count maimed and disfigured. And that excludes the Ukranians he actively hurts with this.
Quak, Quak, quuaakk
More if you count maimed and disfigured. And that excludes the Ukranians he actively hurts with this.
Why? Google should just police their results. Offering a fake Microsoft in your results means you failed providing the service you claimed to offer.
This is either pay to play… and that means google will earn money from fraudsters. Or it will look at certificates… just aite matches certificate… must be good.
Decades worth of whack a mole could have been used to train an AI to actually help here… but we made a glorified word guesser instead.
Can you say what you mean in words that everyone can understand… not just people who know your code? I’m genuinely curious.
But the ones that make it out at least can request asylum with this precedent.
It’s like they exist in an alternate reality. But then I’m fine with that too. If there is a market for that… just a shame that the hunt for this audience eats up everything else.
It’s so stupid and disappointing that this stuff is still news. And I mean this in the "this should have been normal and the norm 2 decades ago " why did the path of progress here stall so much.
But yeah, hope they have a Wonderfull and healthy family.
Regardless, it feels like what we see with Boeing. A company culture that prioritized marketing and time to market over everything else consequences be damned.
Move fast and break stuff is probably not the best strategy if you are building airplanes or processors or other PhD level stuff… Or maybe it’s just never a good strategy.
And with the issues intel had with their processors…
Who is these people that want this? And even if they do. Creating a good game does not need 500 people. And if you want to provide content after setup several small parallel teams to make cosmetics and stuff.
But the whole live service is something the companies want. So they can keep monetizing it and turn if off once a new iteration is done.
They absolutely will. Maybe not tomorrow.
Yeah… or… if your team insists on keeping VMware only for you, you will need to pay for licencing out of your own budget.
I’d start now… these transitions usually take a bit. And Broadcom will only get more predatory. Staying with VMware is not a realistic option… especially if you rely on a support partner. With these mega corps only the other mega corps will get proper support… the rest can crawl in a hole and die
So now is the time to figure out what replacement fits best, check your team for capability gaps and send your VMware people to courses to get intimate with the replacement.
US MIC getting plenty of dollars to counterweigh china’s military spending. Look they probably don’t mind more, but they are having hard enough trouble filling orders as it is.
HyperV looking like a good option for a lot of customers now. They are in the Microsoft noose anyway… so now they can go all in.
Preach brother!
But not using long range US weapons… Right?!
I know… but plenty of writers of articles seem to use the term gamers to identify everyone that plays any game… so of you don’t identify your target audience good enough you run the risk of making something that on paper will appeal to everyone but in practice to no one.
And also successes of iterative games like fifa run on the fact that real world changes to for example teams players are in drive sales… Because the player base is invested in the real world sport… so they want this year’s game because now the players shifted teams. But a new iteration of other games will not have that external pull.
Yeah, agreed. When the game was in its initial round of getting money I spent some money on it, knowing it was a bet. Since then the drama has unfolded and I’m just very interested in how it will unfold.
Since then I have not stopped spending money on some select early access, but simply from the perspective that I’ll sponsor development and hope it goes somewhere. I’ll even sometimes try and give feedback, although nowadays a lot is in discord… and I refuse to yell into that void.
Back to the topic… It’s silly that a company like this still ends up in time crunch before an annual event they plan themselves… and the shadiness of giving pto only after launch and if you are with the company. Hell then they should give pto then and equity now… they are requiring their staff to invest in the company and offering 1:1 pto in compensation… that’s not compensation… that’s theft… as time in the future is less valuable than time now.
All the same, right? Silly stance!