![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
Can’t stop hallucinating about other instances even on .world huh
Can’t stop hallucinating about other instances even on .world huh
Yeah the left coalition in France is very loose. Not gonna be enough to stop the march of the far-right for long.
Buddy, national conservatism is the core component of fascism in a declining capitalist country, and inevitable under “social” liberalism.
Maybe because it’s the instance that hosts the largest pro fascist-coup gov community. Everything I’ve seen from it at least seems to enforce that stereotype
It’s a strictly leftist instance lol (even more so than dbzer0), of course they’ll ban liberals and other right-wingers (and your removed comments seem to be complaining about pronouns for some reason?)
Disagree about there not being good discussions on it; I regularly see the more interesting discussions on Lemmy on that instance, so long as you’re acting in good faith.
It’s exactly what its description says
You can go and ask Hexbear users themselves about it on their general megathread
Why do you feel the need to make this racist
Dang didn’t realize that’s what it was referencing
toots.matapacos.dog is a general leftist unity instance including anarchists. Though I’m not sure if they allow NSFW.
Very common amerika L
China is already on track to producing the most nuclear energy out of any country, and is the world leader in green energy already.
It’s just that they have such a massive population, are highly developed yet are still developing, that this still isn’t enough to meet their energy needs.
Late reply but the fact that people keep pets at all is also a very political subject.
Management/governance of things having to do with humans, which is everything that we know of.
ideology of National Bolshevism
That’s just nazis calling themselves “socialists”, the same way nazis call themselves “national socialists” while actively killing socialists.
Literally everything we know of is already inherently political, on account of being perceivable by humans.
excessive
How much force would have been appropriate then, do you think?
Also, NATOpedia article lmao
I have nothing good going on in my life, so I’ve adopted an extreme viewpoint
Correct. Oppressed peoples tend to support “radical” movements that would improve their lives, and this is a stupid comment for trying to make that sound like a bad thing.
eat the fucking rich, but that’s not what gulags are for
The “fucking rich” / bourgeois are to be shot, not sent to gulags. That’s for the idiots supporting capitalism.
USSR
Thank god the “empire” funded and supported the rebels against the empire lmao
Liberals are so weird lmfao