• GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Kamala is the best version of a normal politician fighting against Trump. It remains to be seen if that’s enough, because he’s just so goddamn weird that it’s difficult to even compare Tool A to Problem B.

    I think she’s incorporated virtually all of the strengths of any of her comparable peers, and almost none of their weaknesses. I think that, given the nature of the opponent and his total lack of seriousness, she said everything I would reasonably hope she would have said during this debate.

    I also think that I don’t properly understand the collective psyche of the American electorate. I don’t understand how the election could be this close, when it is a choice between a serious, competent, passionate, talented professional, and a man who is literally a collection of all of the worst possible traits a person could have. That it could come down to such a narrow choice is a mystery for the ages.

    • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I also think that I don’t properly understand the collective psyche of the American electorate. I don’t understand how the election could be this close, when it is a choice between a serious, competent, passionate, talented professional, and a man who is literally a collection of all of the worst possible traits a person could have.

      Because they’re both genocidal, slave-driving sentient trashpiles that only deserve the second coming of John Brown each, maybe?