• Makhno@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not to mention it violates the constitution

    Almost as if relying entirely on an aged document written by the rich to set laws for the modern rich doesn’t work 🤔

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        No, it isn’t. The Articles of Confederation are what we had first before deciding it had too many flaws and ditching it for the new constitution in 1789. (Note: this is 6 years after the Revolutionary War ended, and 14 years after it started.)

        There’s no reason we can’t or shouldn’t do the same again now. The original writers clearly weren’t shy about pointing out the flaws, and anyone else defending the current constitution as if it shouldn’t be torn to shreds is not following what the founders wanted for us.