• HeChomk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    1 year ago

    Literally impossible to enforce. Any business worth a damn uses vpns. Blocking such would be bad for business. Also, ssl vpns are as far as I’m aware, indistinguishable from regular https traffic.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 year ago

    This kind of nonsense is only mandated out of fear, but in reality it’s not only colossally stupid, but also really difficult to enforce. Any proper business uses one. Anyone who wants privacy, and ad network anonymity uses one. There’s plenty of other uses people would want one, obviously

    • Eggyhead@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just think it’s corporate interests, not fear, that’s driving this. Terror and Children are just the easiest excuse to ensure a lot of people go blindly along with it.

      • dinckel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There aren’t any real corporations left in Russia, that aren’t either government owned, or actively circlejerking around the president for any praise. But otherwise you’re right

  • Tammo-Korsai@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    I fear that the UK might try to join this list not just out of authoritarianism, but out of a fear of technology they do not understand. Worse yet, the Conservative party once threw around the idea of banning encryption in its entirety and acted like WhatsApp is only used by criminals.

    • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ironic, considering how many members of the cabinet are being served court orders for their WhatsApp messages.

      • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s almost like certain members of the cabinet associate encrypted messages with misdeeds because of all the misdeeds they do through these apps. If I were a sceptical man.

  • CringyMikami@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s not a total ban of VPNs, I went to read a bit on the subject (easier since I’m french), it’s just that some politicians came up with a few amendments relative to the bill called “SREN” which very literally translates to “Securing and regulating the digital space”. As you may guess that bill also ticks the “child porn” box as a reason why it came to existence.

    One amendment proposes to ban mobile VPNs that do no comply with European or french regulations in the context of app stores. So it’s only on mobile, nothing about desktops.

    Of course it’s inapplicable in practice.

    Several amendements already failed due to backlash, one was about preventing people from posting on social networks if they use a VPN.

    • Fjor@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah was also just listening to a podcast about this. So yeah not a straight total ban. But from what I heard, it would ban people from using VPNs outside of Europe, which obviously is not OK.

  • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not just France, it’s EU based politics too. There’s certain liberal & center right parties & politicians that heavily push for shit like this, just like the chat control crap.

  • halva@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Russia isn’t prohibiting the use of VPNs but it is making it increasingly more headache inducing (protocol based blocking, ip bans of popular vpn providers).

    • iByteABit [he/him]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Any remote login happens via VPN.

      I don’t support this, but you don’t need VPNs for remote logins. SSH exists, it’s just that VPNs are a better solution for companies among other things.

  • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    VPNs are not illegal in China, Russia, UAE, or the DPRK. That’s 4 out of 5 where you didn’t research it properly. In China, VPN use is legal, setting up your own VPN for domestic use is legal, but renting nodes to foreign companies is illegal unless you can document what the nodes are being used for which VPN providers can’t. In Russia, VPN use is legal, but VPN providers must comply with censorship laws and deny access to their blacklist. In the UAE, VPN use is legal, but using a VPN while committing a crime is illegal (So you get a stricter sentence than if you had just committed the crime). In the DPRK, VPN use is legal, but kinda pointless since they have a nation-wide intranet. If you want to access the internet, you use the PUST-run VPN. If you’re a tourist, you can use it to connect to your home or work VPN.

      • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re propagating the misinformation. You should try to verify things before repeating them. The tweet didn’t provide sources and isn’t made by someone with credentials.

        • Fjor@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It was literally used in the article by techradar…