Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.
Game journalism (yes, WAY before “SJW/woke/DEI” crybaby babbling): OMG THIS GAME THAT ISN’T EVEN PLAYABLE YET GETS 10/10 GOTY! RISE OF THE ROBOTS WILL REVOLUTIONIZE 90s GAMING FOREVER!
Tech journalism: WILL THIS STARTUP’S MARKETING PITCH FINALLY CREATE THE ROBOGOD THAT BEGINS THE NERD RAPTURE?
Pop science journalism is also frequently sensationalist garbage. In my own field where i am familiar with the subject matter i’d say they have a hit rate of maybe 50% where they actually write something good albeit boring for the average reader, and that’s mostly because the people writing have a real background in science. In other fields where the journalists are essentially amateur enthusiasts the ratio of decent pieces to garbage is even worse.
I am starting to consider whether or not the masses being conditioned to consoom is helping disingenuous “journalism” outlets like IGNorant and Faux News
Game journalism (yes, WAY before “SJW/woke/DEI” crybaby babbling): OMG THIS GAME THAT ISN’T EVEN PLAYABLE YET GETS 10/10 GOTY! RISE OF THE ROBOTS WILL REVOLUTIONIZE 90s GAMING FOREVER!
Tech journalism: WILL THIS STARTUP’S MARKETING PITCH FINALLY CREATE THE ROBOGOD THAT BEGINS THE NERD RAPTURE?
Yeah. This is why I never trust journalists in general period with few exceptions.
Pop science journalism is also frequently sensationalist garbage. In my own field where i am familiar with the subject matter i’d say they have a hit rate of maybe 50% where they actually write something good albeit boring for the average reader, and that’s mostly because the people writing have a real background in science. In other fields where the journalists are essentially amateur enthusiasts the ratio of decent pieces to garbage is even worse.
I am starting to consider whether or not the masses being conditioned to consoom is helping disingenuous “journalism” outlets like IGNorant and Faux News