Gork@lemm.ee to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 24 days agoCore 2 Ruleofiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1850arrow-down10
arrow-up1850arrow-down1imageCore 2 Ruleofiles.catbox.moeGork@lemm.ee to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 24 days agomessage-square67fedilink
minus-squareNewNewAccount@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·24 days ago5400 rpm was very common. 7200 were the performance drives.
minus-squareBeigeAgenda@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2·24 days agoAs I remember around 2007, 5400 RPM was frowned upon in builds. The disks I have from that time is a WD RE2 (very noisy 7200 RPM) and a few WD Green’s (I think they are slower than 5400 RPM just to mess with my arguments).
minus-squaretrigonated@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·24 days agoAnd if you wanted very high performance, you could go with a 10000rpm one.
5400 rpm was very common. 7200 were the performance drives.
As I remember around 2007, 5400 RPM was frowned upon in builds.
The disks I have from that time is a WD RE2 (very noisy 7200 RPM) and a few WD Green’s (I think they are slower than 5400 RPM just to mess with my arguments).
And if you wanted very high performance, you could go with a 10000rpm one.