If body cams get cheaper and cheaper, companies might start asking more people to wear them while working.

E.g.: https://coloradosun.com/2024/07/31/youth-corrections-audio-surveillance/

I could see this for doctors, at restaurants, stores,, etc… eventually.

Are you ready to wear one?

EDIT TO ADD: A few people said this wouldn’t ever make sense for doctors (privacy laws) or for fixed locations (stores). I should have thought of that.

But what about Uber / bus drivers, or repair people who go into homes? I can imagine a large corporation thinking a cam is a good idea, for their own CYA (not for the customers’ or the employees’).

Also I don’t like this idea either, to be clear. I was mostly playing devil’s advocate here to see what you all think. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Pretty much what I expected, tbh

  • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why doctors? Filming patients would be a nightmare in terms of privacy and data policy.

    In my line of work (psychotherapy) it would be equally impossible. People are having a hard enough time as it is opening up to medical professionals, I don’t think that the additional barrier of being actively filmed would help anyone.

    • dingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah I’m not a doctor but I work in healthcare. Would be a massive HIPAA violation (patient privacy laws).

    • perishthethought@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Check out the linked article. I agree with you but that agency is only adding cameras for the agency’s benefit, not the worker’s.

      • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Youth corrections staff is still a whole other story than doctors though. A physical examination is probably one of the most vulnerable positions one could be in. These cameras would record people getting naked, multiple orifices being examined, and patients talking about symptoms or things they are unsure and often ashamed about.

        The cost would be enormous. I imagine many people would be even more reluctant to go to the doctor than they are now.

        And the benefit, in my opinion, would be very slim. Medical malpractice is far more subtle than the examples from the article. As patients we’re rarely worried that our doctor will physically assault us, we’re worried about errors in judgement, delays in care, and prejudices based on gender, ethnicity, age, sexuality, and so on. And those aren’t directly observable most of the time. Even if you get the moment on camera where your doctor decides to trivialize your symptoms you mostly wouldn’t be able to prove it happened for discriminatory reasons.