• John Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    At this point in time it isn’t enough. Republicans and the conservative justices will find whatever loopholes there are. They need to be advocating to change the role of the Supreme Court to an advisory agency only, where they have no decision-making powers.

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The SCOTUS is necessary in a functioning system of checks and balances on power amongst the three branches of the federal government. The problem we have now is a court stacked with looney judges subverting the will of the people. We need a more effective means of maintaining balance in the court.

        • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sure have. The SCOTUS takes up cases from the US Circuit Courts of Appeals. Appellate courts certainly serve their purpose, as district courts can and do get decisions wrong. But, the SCOTUS needs to be balanced enough to where one political viewpoint doesn’t dominate their decisions and subsequent precedents.

    • zigmus64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m not sure they need loopholes. They’re perfectly fine with tossing out precedent and rehashing settled law. Next step is to just make shit up.