• Marxism-Fennekinism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Faster USB chipset is more expensive and potentially also physically larger with more traces on the circuit board to deal with I imagine. And faster data speeds require more attention to how the traces are routed to prevent interference. I very much doubt this is anything other than to save a relatively small amount on materials and engineering costs, on an already overpriced phone, and/or to try and “encourage” you to use iCloud by making offline sync and backup painfully slow.

    • RealHonest@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As someone involved in engineering boards with both USB 2.0 and 3.0 the costs are negligible. You’re not wrong about more traces or about it requiring more attention but per phone this cost less then a few cents.

      I think it’s more about the upsell to the Pro line or as you suggested encouraging use of iCloud.

      • jasondj@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As I remember it the USB 3.0 chips can cause interference in 2.4GHz range unless shielding is used and the USB chipset is kept far away from the 2.4Ghz antennas. Probably just “juice not worth the squeeze” on the smaller non-pro model, if there’s a significant chance it could interfere with Bluetooth and wifi.