A group of astronomers want to change the definition of a planet. Their new proposed definition wouldn’t bring Pluto back into the planetary fold, but it could reclassify thousands of celestial bodies across the universe. From a report:

The International Astronomical Union’s (IAU) current definition of a planet, established in 2006, includes only celestial bodies that are nearly round, are gravitationally dominant and orbit our Sun. This Sun-centric definition excludes all of the bodies we’ve discovered outside our solar system, even if they may fit all other parameters. They are instead considered exoplanets. Those behind the new proposal critiqued the IAU’s definition in an upcoming paper in the Planetary Science Journal, arguing it’s vague, not quantitative and unnecessarily exclusionary.

Their new proposal would instead classify planets based on their mass, considering a planet to be any celestial body that:

  1. orbits one or more stars, brown dwarfs or stellar remnants and,
  2. is more massive than 10ÂÂ kilograms (kg) and,
  3. is less massive than 13 Jupiter masses (2.5 X 10^28Âkg).
    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      One day we’re gonna find something orbiting a moon and then you’re gonna feel really silly.

    • Ugly Bob@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      What about Pluto and Charon? Their barycenter is outside Pluto.

      I propose binary (and more generally n-ary) planets.

    • slickgoat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Both orbit stars. Both are planets in my book. Planets and moons are codependent. In fact, Earth and it’s moon are binary planets.

      Saying otherwise is useless stella bigotry.

      • Zachariah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes, it’s already a planet. Just like dwarf stars are already stars, dwarf planets are already planets. It’s right there in the name.

        • Gsus4@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Ok, then, Pluto is also a (dwarf) planet, what is the big fuss?

          PS: sorry, I thought you were the OP dude at the top of this thread, we are in agreement, then.