The legislation, which states that “protections for access to abortion rights … should be supported," was blocked by Republicans who panned it as a “show vote.”

Senate Republicans on Wednesday blocked legislation led by Democrats to revive the protections of Roe v. Wade in the wake of the Supreme Court eliminating the nationwide right to abortion.

The vote was 49-44, falling short of the super-majority needed to defeat a filibuster due to broad opposition from Republicans, who dismissed it as a political stunt.

The Reproductive Freedom for Women Act, introduced last month around the second anniversary of the court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, is just a few sentences long. It states that “protections for access to abortion rights and other reproductive health care” after the 2022 ruling “should be supported.” It adds that “the protections enshrined in* Roe v. Wade …* should be restored and built upon, moving towards a future where there is reproductive freedom for all.”

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    My first reaction was “Why wasn’t this done when the decision was first leaked? Why wait 2 years?”

    The Reproductive Freedom for Women Act […] is just a few sentences long. It states that “protections for access to abortion rights and other reproductive health care” […] “should be supported.” It adds that “the protections enshrined in Roe v. Wade … should be restored and built upon, moving towards a future where there is reproductive freedom for all.”

    That’s not the language of writing laws. It’s completely vague and unenforceable. It really is just a political stunt for an election year.

    Why is it so hard to make a real law to actually do this!?