BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zonecake to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agoAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square308fedilinkarrow-up1418arrow-down10
arrow-up1418arrow-down1imageAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneBluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zonecake to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square308fedilink
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month ago This fact has nothing to do with the philosophy of consenting to exist If living organisms are predisposed to prefer existence, this would imply existence is an inherently preferable state. Something that does not exist cannot desire. Prove it
minus-squareretrieval4558@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month ago If living organisms are predisposed to prefer existence, this would imply existence is an inherently preferable state. It usually is- to a living organism, which is not what we’re talking about. Prove it Come on bro you can’t be serious about this.
If living organisms are predisposed to prefer existence, this would imply existence is an inherently preferable state.
Prove it
It usually is- to a living organism, which is not what we’re talking about.
Come on bro you can’t be serious about this.