• dactylotheca@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Any predictions on how long it’ll take for conservatives to start outlawing sterilizations for women?

    • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      My friend with severe PCOS and who would never be able to be pregnant had the hardest time already trying to get a hysterectomy at 28. Even asked about her future husband being ok with this decision.

      So we aren’t that far off already.

      • Otakulad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I can understand making absolutely sure that this is what the woman wants, but don’t bring in an imaginary person into the decision. That is for her and the person she starts seeing down the line and whether she wants to tell him on the first date.

      • state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        To be fair, men also get asked if they’re really sure by some doctors when going in for a vasectomy. Even when closing in on 50 and with three kids at home. But as long as they perform the procedure I don’t care.

        • Otakulad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I had mine at 42 and I don’t think there was much asking if this is what I really wanted. It was an explanation of the procedure and how long I’ll be out.

          Day of, it was snip snip, have a good day. No need for the frozen peas on your nuts.

          • state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Oh, the procedure was fine. 40 minutes after I was called out of the waiting room I walked out and had zero issues. And also zero swimmers since. All good there.

            But when I had the first appointment, he asked me if I was really sure and if my wife knew and was also fine with it. But I know that it depends on the doctor.

  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Part of the reason why I am getting my daughters citizenship abroad. One day, I hope that day never ever comes, they might need it.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        My wife holds dual citizenship and her country has many ex-pats so they have right of return laws.

        Next month we have an appointment with the embassy with her country as well as the interviews. I also have them in a class where they are learning the language of her country.

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The lesbian woman got sterelized in case she gets raped so it doesn’t result in pregnancy. That’s … wow.

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you read to the end, the article mentions that the first time Ferst tried to get sterilized (and her old doctor was being difficult) she still had a male partner. I think she’s bisexual.

  • SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If anybody read the study, which I highly doubt, you’ll see that this story is highly exaggerated. The actually study showed the sterilization in women went from 2.83 per 100k people per month before Dobbs to 5.31 per 100k people per month after Dobbs. For men, the increase went from 1.03 per 100k people per month to 1.18 per 100k people per month.

    Here’s the study for anybody who wants to see it:

    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-health-forum/fullarticle/2817438

    There is a visible increase, but the actual rate is a lot smaller than what this article is attempting to suggest.

    • Adalast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I didn’t read this article, so idk how they spun things, but given the title and the information you shared from the actual study, they sensationalized, not exaggerated. 5.31 is an 87% increase from 2.31, which is a rounding error off 2x. Honestly, in medical/psychological/anthropological/sociological studies the sigmas are never high enough for my comfort as a probabilist anyway.

      • SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Usually rates that involve small raw numbers get swayed pretty significantly by relatively small changes. For example, Malta had a 3 murders last year, if that number doubled to 6, the homicide rate would increase by 100%. That’s a very significant increase, but does it imply that Malta has turned into a dangerous country? Not really, no. The increase would make it’s rate go from 0.561 per 100k to 1.122 per 100k, that’s around the same as New Zealand which is another very safe country. It should still be noted and discussed because there’s value in that, but my point is that these trends and swings in statistics can be pretty misleading if not put into proper context.

        • Adalast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh, I get that. I actually have a BS in Applied Mathematics and specialize in Statistics, Probability Theory, and Data Science professionally. I am well aware of how unstable thses numbers are, which is why I made the jab at the “soft sciences” and their acceptable sigma analysis points.

          What I was more noting was the linguistic tic of OP saying that they ‘exaggerated’. I freely admit that I did not actually read the article and do not know what the author did in it, but the click-bait title was accurate given the data shared. So what was done is to ‘sensationalize’ the results. If we are ever going to get better and teach society how to understand when statistics are being used to manipulate, we need to be sure to describe it in a way that people can recognize one manipulation from another.

          I would see an example of manipulation through exaggeration being “cops kill more white people per year than black people”. Yes, this is true, but it is inflating one piece of the statistics that ignores a lot of relevant factors, like the per capita rate, the proportion of stops and actions by police which result in violence, etc.

          Sensationalizing is what we have here. Intentionally choosing words that fell the full picture of the statistic in a way which causes knee jerk reactions. There isn’t anything left out per se, the time frame is described, the change in the statistic is mentioned, and a potential causal relationship is proffered. Would "The overturning of Roe has caused a statistically significant increase in the number of voluntary sterilizations among young US Citizens’ haave been more genuine, yes. Is it catchy or emotional, no.

  • MeatPilot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hard truth for folks to understand is people actually fuck because it’s fun and a healthy part of a relationship.

    This is what happens when you have no alternatives left to manage accidents and don’t want to live like a nun or monk.

    • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Oh they understand people fuck, and the people who want to ban abortion and contraception want people to have kids they didn’t want for various reasons.

  • binomialchicken@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Blows my mind that vasectomies are the less common procedure. Got mine done cheaply many years ago. Super easy, barely an inconvenience.

    Partner got tubes done recently (so that insurance couldn’t deny her for medically necessary hysterectomy later, what a dumb system we have) and she was miserably bedridden for quite a while, with the scars to prove it. Would have been expensive if she wasn’t maxed for out-of-pocket already.

    Anyone have a sane explanation?

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Dear young men. Get a vasectomy. You don’t want to raise children in a doomed future, plus it might do wonders to your dating profile.