• jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fund mental health institutions and make it easier to involuntarily commit people before they buy weapons and go on rampages?

    Case after case, you see more red flags than a May Day Parade, but none of it legally actionable or reportable on a background check.

    Examples:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uvalde_school_shooting

    “Ramos’ social media acquaintances said he openly abused and killed animals such as cats and would livestream the abuse on Yubo.[132] Other social media acquaintances said that he would also livestream himself on Yubo threatening to kidnap and rape girls who used the app, as well as threatening to commit a school shooting.[131] Ramos’ account was reported to Yubo, but no action was taken.[131][133]”

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkland_high_school_shooting

    “The Florida Department of Children and Families investigated him in September 2016 for Snapchat posts in which he cut both his arms and said he planned to buy a gun. At this time, a school resource officer suggested[92] he undergo an involuntary psychiatric examination under the provisions of the Baker Act. Two guidance counselors agreed, but a mental institution did not.[93] State investigators reported he had depression, autism, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, psychologist Frederick M. Kravitz later testified that Cruz was never diagnosed with autism.[94] In their assessment, they concluded he was “at low risk of harming himself or others”.[95] He had previously received mental health treatment, but had not received treatment in the year leading up to the shooting.[96]”

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Hook_Elementary_School_shooting

    "In a 2013 interview, Peter Lanza (Adam’s father) said he suspected his son might have also had undiagnosed schizophrenia in addition to his other conditions. Lanza said that family members might have missed signs of the onset of schizophrenia and psychotic behavior during his son’s adolescence because they mistakenly attributed his odd behavior and increasing isolation to Asperger syndrome.[155][162][169][170][171] Because of concerns that published accounts of Lanza’s autism could result in a backlash against others with the condition, autism advocates campaigned to clarify that autism is a brain-related developmental disorder rather than a mental illness.[172] The violence Lanza demonstrated in the shooting is generally not seen in the autistic population[173] and none of the psychiatrists he saw detected troubling signs of violence in his disposition.[155]

    Lanza appears to have had no contact with mental health providers after 2006. The report from the Office of the Child Advocate stated: “In the course of Lanza’s entire life, minimal mental health evaluation and treatment (in relation to his apparent need) was obtained. Of the couple of providers that saw him, only one—the Yale Child Study Center—seemed to appreciate the gravity of (his) presentation, his need for extensive mental health and special education supports, and the critical need for medication to ease his obsessive-compulsive symptoms.”[165]"

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Buffalo_shooting

    "In June 2021, Gendron had been investigated for threatening other students at his high school by the police in Broome County.[20][60][66] A teacher had asked him about his plans after the school year, to which Gendron responded, “I want to murder and commit suicide.”[67] He was referred to a hospital for mental health evaluation and counseling but was released after being held for a day and a half.[20][66][68]

    Gendron told police that he was merely joking; however, Gendron later wrote online that this was actually a well-executed bluff.[65][69] He was not charged in connection with the incident since, according to investigators, he had not made a specific enough threat to warrant further action.[66][69] The New York State Police did not seek an order from a state court to remove guns from Gendron’s possession.[69][70] The mental health evaluation was not an involuntary commitment, which would have prohibited him from buying guns under federal law.[69]"

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Then I ask this: School shootings simply never happened when I was a kid in the 70’s and 80’s. We had far less regulation*. Any asshole could buy a gun, get it delivered to their doorstep, and they were cheap. Yes, even AR-15s.

        This shit all started with Columbine. Want to suicide and go out the most horrific way possible? Shoot up a school!

        So no, it’s not the guns. Nothing has really changed on that front. So what happened?

        * One exception: Conceal carry laws were nothing like today, far more restrictive. I’m leaving that out because criminals and mass murderers hardly give a shit about carrying illegally. Would that stop you if you were intent on murder? Also, at the same time, the laws around transporting guns generally became more restrictive.

  • norimee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    “BuT gUns doNt kilL PeoPle, PeoPle kilL PeoPle”

    Then regulate fucking people’s access to guns! It’s not that hard.

    • Xephonian@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Problem is, gun are useful.
      They protect our children.
      They protect our food supply.
      They protect our freedom.

      And people have been killing each other for centuries before guns were invented. Thinking that guns are the reason for death is clearly propaganda. But you all know that. I’m just here to point out what actual reality looks like. Since none of you have ever touched grass.

      • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Guns don’t protect children. They’re the leading cause of death in children.

        I have no idea what you’re talking about with protecting food…hunting? Not how most people get their food. Most people get food from a grocery store…where they’re increasingly likely to get shot.

        If the freedom line was in reference to the military, there’s hardly a vet alive who’s done that… they’re all dead from old age. The only wars we’ve been fighting were for revenge or resources. I say that as a vet.

        If you’re talking about protecting us from our government…as far as I know, nobody has even won an armed confrontation with the police or feds over freedoms. Guns made Waco worse. Guns made Ruby Ridge worse. I guess the Bundy’s protected their “right” to steal from taxpayers by grazing their cattle on public land without paying for it like they should have. That feels like a less important right than “life” to me personally.

        • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Guns don’t protect children. They’re the leading cause of death in children.

          Fucking THANK YOU!

        • akakunai@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          They’re the leading cause of death in children.

          Uh…WHAT? Ain’t no fucking way. *checks statistics*

          …😳 what the actual fuck. Y’all doin alright down there?

      • beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Cars are useful. Cars protect children in many situations. Cars are among the things that majorly contribute to even having a food supply. Cars freedom patriotism eagles liberty-gasm!

        Yet it is still possible to have cars serve those functions without giving in to the lobbies that wish to make it mandatory to get paid for shoving a car down the throat of every loony who wants one to hurt others with. Because cars are well regulated to make them as safe as possible.

        • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Because cars are well regulated to make them as safe as possible.

          While this is debatable, the regulation of cars is still a useful allegory for gun regulation.

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Because cars are well regulated to make them as safe as possible.

          Usually for those inside, not outside

          • barsquid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I like when they surprise me. “Capitalism perfect, guns good, diversity bad,” builds up a sort of caricature. Then that is completely broken with the weird digression, “HTTPS is bad and imperfect, throw it all out.”

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I have had to say this many times lately, just because something is propaganda, doesn’t automatically make it false.

        The best propaganda is the truth.

        Since you clearly have no idea of how propaganda works.

      • Demuniac@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I live in the Netherlands. No one I know owns a gun. Yet I have all the things you list in abundance. Added bonus: lack of school shootings and gun violence.

        Your propaganda argument is nothing but you sticking your head in the sand. That, or you are a successful troll.

        • Jank@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          But how do you deal with the horrors of all that communism?

          Is it not a terrifying wasteland with less… consumer goods? I would die without my Kit Kat flavored Trix cereal.

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I knew two people from Ukraine who had guns. Now I know only one. Another died from COVID.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Problem is, gun are useful.

        Problem is, people are stupid.

        Which is evidenced by both your shitty grammar, and tired argument.

  • twig@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    A lot of Americans do actually support some gun control measures. A lot of Americans also don’t actually know how insanely hard and effectively the NRA has organized and opposed any remotely reasonable gun control measure. They basically ensure that any hearing on the subject is flooded by their members to oppose it. They just go and many sane Americans don’t.

    I’m not American, but I actually support sane firearm ownership. I look at the lunacy over there and I am almost shocked. I really do think, from hearing about this as much as I do, that many Americans support sane measures. But the NRA is a huge problem. It prevents people from even being educated on this issue.