• MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Still just on the first step, embrace.

      Apparently threads didn’t support federating replies (comments) on posts until this.

      And you still won’t be able to reply to the federated comments on posts, just see them.

      They are really not in a hurry to properly support federating. I honestly didn’t realize Threads’ federation support was this pathetic.

      • Sabata@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        They haven’t figured out a good way to turn the federated data into cash yet.

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Are you kidding? Lemmy itself is 100% public and easily scrapable. It’s likely easier to get data on users.

          • Sabata@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It still needs to be profitable for them. Why would they want non profitable content freeloading on their servers? No doubt it will be collected and sold, just a work in progress.

              • Sabata@ani.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                They sell it to advertisers. We would be hard to target since were not on Metas platform. I would think it’s worth less since its not immediately usable for stuffing an ad down our throats and pseudoanonymous.

      • nyan@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I honestly didn’t realize Threads’ federation support was this pathetic.

        Maybe they noticed that a lot of servers in the wider Fediverse had preemptively defederated from them, and decided it wasn’t worth their time.

    • yildolw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The Fediverse has 1 million active users. Threads has 130 million active users. This is not an EEE play because a 100% successful EEE play would amount to increasing the Threads userbase by less than 1%. Meta is doing this for non-EEE reasons.

      One possible non-EEE reason would be to have plausible deniability for monopolistic practices. If they make a show of interoperating with irrelevant nobodies like us, they can pretend to be a nice tech company rather than a mean anti-competitive monopoly.

      • Dran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I believe google hangouts and xmpp would like to have a word with you. There was probably a universe where federated xmpp was as ubiquitous as sms, but in this universe, google federated, brought users over with cool features, and then defederated when they had all the users.

        If you want another example from the same company in modern times, look at chrome and http/css/js. Google’s chokehold on the web ecosystem with chrome means that whatever they do, everyone else has to follow suit or not be compatible with the browser that something like ~75-90% of users use