• Time removed its paywall in June 2023, resulting in a rise in advertising revenue but a loss of digital subscribers, with traffic remaining relatively flat.
  • The decision was influenced by broader industry trends and the publisher’s focus on working with advertisers and leveraging its brand equity in other ventures.
  • Time aims to achieve profitability by expanding its direct advertising and sponsorship business, growing its global events slate, and exploring new ventures like connected television.
  • Ghostface@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why haven’t publication embraced crypto donations like BAT?

    I feel much better about sending tokens ive earned by selling my attention, and then sending those earnings to publications which garner my attention.

    Is media just too old to adapt?

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Why would it have to be a crypto donation? Their bank accounts are in USD. Most of their readers have USD. People can transfer USD. What does some arbitrary crypto thing you want to pretend is money add that makes it better for those “most people”?

        • spongebue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          If by “a big cut” you mean maybe a few percent, and that most businesses take electronic payments anyway because there are advantages (people are more likely to buy stuff when convenient, accounting is easier, less risk of theft/loss than physical cash, etc) then sure, I guess.

          If you think the solution is to make up a new kind of imaginary money that takes a shitton of energy to maintain, which has tons of different types (Bitcoin, Ethereum, whatever one was referenced in the initial comment) and would happen to greatly benefit those who happened to be early adopters (TOTAL coincidence, I’m sure)… No.

          • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Using crypto helps diversify wealth away from the banks and individuals that own the overwhelming majority of dollars, euros, etc.

            Who do you want to benefit?

            • spongebue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Generally speaking, people who contribute to society.

              I don’t see “gambling on the right cryptocurrency” as a contribution to society. I also don’t see how “individuals that own the overwhelming majority of dollars, euros, etc.” wouldn’t simply become “individuals that own the overwhelming majority of cryptocurrency” by virtue of working with that

    • Peffse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      maybe it is tax reasons? I know that for personal taxes you have to simply declare crypto earnings but business tax laws don’t really like grey areas.

      • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The tax man doesn’t care if your business takes cash, card, or crypto. Income is income, whether you’re a business or a regular joe.

        • Peffse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t think it’s that simple for a business. Crypto is simultaneously an asset and an income once it is sold, but also not a traditionally defined accounting asset. Combine that with how slow the government has been to properly define crypto, I bet most businesses would rather just not have to deal with it. Last thing they’d want is the IRS coming after them for doing it wrong.

          • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            As someone who’s accepted crypto as payment for about 10 years now, it really isn’t. Income is income to the IRS. You pay taxes on the value of the crypto you received as payment, full stop. It really doesn’t matter what you accept as payment. Could be crypto, could be russet potatos.

    • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Probably because the overwhelming majority of people see crypto as a scam, and the market share for its use is trivial and better facilitated by actual currency. As well, it’s extremely volatile and the flagship coin recently halfed itself. It’s probably one of the worst things a company can accept in exchange for goods or services.

      • null@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        the flagship coin recently halfed itself

        Why mention something you don’t understand at all?

        • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          What, you mean I read a headline and repeated it in the wrong context? Damnit. I totally should have wasted 20 minutes reading further about a faux currency that I can’t even buy groceries with

          • null@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Nah, way better to just spout off misinformation about things you won’t even take 20 mins to educate yourself about.

            • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Ah, making a mistake is spouting misinformation. I see you love hyperbole! I’ll be sure to tell my high school students when they get quiz question wrong their answers are misinformation because they didn’t study. See, I like hyperbole, too

        • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ah, so the people creating essentially get paid half for the same amount of work. That’s WAY better lol. Yeah, I’m not super into knowing so much about faux currency. I tend to deal with the real kind. So please pardon my mistake 🙏

            • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Oh, are you talking about the insanely high non-renewable energy used to mine coin and distribute, which is way beyond even AI?

              Because I think it’s pretty evident that the coin halving heavily impacts our environment as it now takes twice as much energy to create the same value.

              Actually giving a shit about the Earth 101 for ya.

      • Ghostface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The old perception is reality, while your not wrong, still means decent institutions are losing out on funding options.

        Credit cards were seen as a scam at one point because scary digital currency. Same with torrent protocol. To be honest I’m suprised lemmy doesn’t accept it for server donations.

        So its either stay with the current model which is visibly dying or find another way

        • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I mean, I don’t think accepting crypto would make or break any organization beyond a niche mom and pop operation. If they would die without accepting crypto, they are likely not going to be saved by it. I doubt there are many people, especially in the USA, who would or could only donate via that option.

          In my personal opinion, crypto IS a scam and every organization would be best served dealing in real currency.

          • null@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Admits to not even spending 20 minutes to try understanding it

            iTs A sCaM

            • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              If I can’t buy groceries, pay rent or medical bills with it, it’s in not a real currency. If I can’t bail myself out with it, it’s not a real currency. But sure, somehow paying money to get faux money that can’t really practically pay for my needs, and then needs to be reconverted to real currency to take care of my needs is somehow not a scam.

              Also, I’m sure you’re super cool with the insane non-renewable energy cost of bitcoin mining and distribution. It far outweighs the energy cost of AI that everyone is complaining about.