• ByteJunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This.

    Also, tie together more countries’ power grids to even out production and demand of renewables, and reduce the need for other backup sources.

    For a fraction of the cost of nuclear, increase the storage capacity as well. We’ve had days where the price per MWh was negative in many hours, because of excess production.

    The barriers to carbon free energy aren’t technical, they’re purely political.

    • Caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, back in 2010 and before nuclear was the way to go but with the incredible advancements in solar and wind it’s no longer the best option.

      Still shame on Germany for decommissioning nuclear reactors and deciding to build Nordstream 2 and burn coal as a replacement.

      • partizan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        You probably also didnt heard about Thorium based molten salt reactors, they are much safer than conventional nuclear, also cheaper, and you can have a 50MW installation in space not much larger than a shipping container. A 50MW solar installation is close to 1km2 and thats without any storage included. It even can be modified to run on spent fuel of conventional nuclear power plants.

        • sandbox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          No industry has quite so much vaporware technology as nuclear power. Any idiot can promise and never deliver. Look at Elon Musk.

        • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          SMRs are DOA. They have been “the next big thing” for decades now. They need to shit or get off the pot.