• NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Laughable, how they put it.

    data protection agencies in 11 European countries – and those agencies, led by Ireland, telling the Facebook giant to scrap the slurp.

    They are making such a pathetic show about their own decision to observe the law.

    And this is a law that is clearly and openly readable. You don’t need legal experts to understand the basics, and you don’t need any agencies telling you that you must observe it.

    They are constantly giving the impression as if they were a gang of professional outlaws and only if somebody catches them redhanded, then they are able make a decision - one decision for one case, exceptipnally - to behave properly.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      They are the worst of the worst, and I will never use an instance that voluntarily federates with Threads. I respect MS more than Meta, and that’s a pretty incredible feat on the part of Meta.

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        MS is catching up tho. Imagine Facebook style OS lol can’t escape the tracking ever

    • sunzu@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      And sure as fuck corrupt Ireland hosting US big tech should NOT be the one leading anything privacy related… It is a charade IMHO

  • dmtalon@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    Its crazy how much further ahead Europe is in Privacy Protection.

    All these companies need to be held responsible for what they do with our data, and what it costs them when they lose control of it. Either figure out how to safe guard it or suffer painful consequences. Or perhaps only store what’s necessary for us to interact.

    • Grippler@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      But then again, we also have pretty much every EU group pushing for super invasive chat control. It’s ridiculous how schizophrenic they are on the subject of digital privacy.

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        They are telling what they care about, take notice.

        I am once they get a local AI grfiter, they will change tune too.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    And while this climb down has been cheered by privacy advocates, Meta called it “a step backwards for European innovation” that will cause “further delays bringing the benefits of AI to people in Europe.”

    “We’re disappointed by the request from the Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC), our lead regulator, on behalf of the European DPAs, to delay training our large language models (LLMs) using public content shared by adults on Facebook and Instagram  — particularly since we incorporated regulatory feedback and the European DPAs have been informed since March,” the social network said in a statement on Friday.

    Without a steady diet of EU information, Meta’s AI systems won’t be able to “accurately understand important regional languages, cultures or trending topics on social media,” the American goliath said at the time.

    “In order to get the most out of generative AI and the opportunities it brings, it is crucial that the public can trust that their privacy rights will be respected from the outset,” Almond continued.

    “We will continue to monitor major developers of generative AI, including Meta, to review the safeguards they have put in place and ensure the information rights of UK users are protected.”

    Privacy group noyb had filed complaints with various European DPAs about Meta’s LLM training plans, and its chair Max Schrems on Friday said while the organization welcomed the news, it “will monitor this closely.”


    The original article contains 589 words, the summary contains 231 words. Saved 61%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!