• kbotc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yea, I get that it likely wasn’t what was decided in the original case, but to claim that case isn’t what the justices use to define corporate personhood is ignorant.

    The much more egregious error that is referred to is Qualified Immunity, which seems to have been invented whole cloth by a scribe during the first time US laws were collated when he incorrectly wrote down a law.

    https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4179628