Squeezed by high interest rates and record prices, homeowners are frozen in place. They can’t sell. So first-time buyers can’t buy.

If buying a home is an inexorable part of the American dream, so is the next step: eventually selling that home and using the equity to trade up to something bigger.

But over the past two years, this upward mobility has stalled as buyers and sellers have been pummeled by three colliding forces: the highest borrowing rates in nearly two decades, a crippling shortage of inventory, and a surge in home prices to a median of $434,000, the highest on record, according to Redfin.

People who bought their starter home a few years ago are finding themselves frozen in place by what is known as the “rate-lock effect” — they bought when interest rates were historically low, and trading up would mean a doubling or tripling of their monthly interest payments.

They are locked in, and as a result, families hoping to buy their first homes are locked out.

Non-paywall link

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    A “starter home” is still a home, is still a roof over your head and a place to sleep.

    And you’re not subject to the whims of some slumlord.

    Owning your own home (even if it’s not “keeping up with the Jonses” compliant) is not a horrible position to be in.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Got a fixed rate 30 year mortgage and I’m paying less today for twice the space than I was paying 15 years ago when I first bought my home. I have a friend who got a relatively tiny 1400 sqft row house for $80k back in 2006 and paid less than $1k/mo in rent + utilities for nearly a decade, until she got married and needed extra space for kids.

      If you’re confident you won’t be moving for the next five years, a house or condo at a fixed rate is consistently a way better deal than chasing apartment teaser rates every 12 months. But landing that kind of space means a steady income in a professional career. Its not something folks in the service sector - with irregular hours and changes in location and depressed wages - can reliably count on.

      In the end, this is far more a problem of shitty unreliable working conditions than best-practices for picking a residence.

      • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        This comment is so wild to my non US eyes. I had to convert the sqft you gave because I missremembered. Friends of mine are family with two kids and live in a bit more than half that space (80m2) - and are not the exception from what I know.

        To see 130m2 “too small for the family” is really weird and I’d love to see/understand where the differences come from. I guess that even how the space is calculated might have an impact. Really fascinating!

        Thanks for sharing!

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          To see 130m2 “too small for the family” is really weird

          The unit was a two story with a big chunk of the real estate eaten up by a stairwell. For one kid, it was a squeeze but manageable. But when they were expecting twins, plus juggling a little boy, they decided to upgrade to a house with a full kitchen, a backyard, and a third bedroom.

          I’m sure people have gotten by on less. But when you can get a 275m^2 home for $250k out in the 'burbs and you’re a two-income family of engineers, the only thing holding you back is the commute.

    • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      The framing of the article’s headline is bad, but the problem is that because people in starter homes can’t trade up, first time buyers can’t buy starter homes. Ultimately, the problem is that MORE people are stuck renting.

      And that’s purely descriptive. The people in the starter homes are not to blame, in any moral sense. But people read blame into it because emotionally resonant headlines get more clicks, so they frame it that way.