“We believe RPGs are big … So we always believed the audience was there,” says Adam Smith

  • FireTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    1 year ago

    It seems like the BG3 devs tried to make a good game and hoped it’d be popular vs other devs who try to make a profitable game and hope it’s good.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s exactly it. Pretty much every five meters you think “Whoever created this actually gave a shit about the whole product”. It never feels like things are worse than they should be, or that they could have been better with a little effort.

      It’s the kind of game where everyone who worked on it can be very proud. Do you think the average Blizzard developer these days can say the same?

      • Agrivar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        that they could have been better with a little effort.

        Clearly, you are still in the first or second act.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, I’m in the third. Sorry. There are definitely things that could be better, but not “with a little effort”.

        • Oldmandan@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s a lot of griping about the third act, and yeah, I get it, it’s incomplete and comparatively poorly optimized. But it’s still really good. :P They clearly bit off more than they could chew with the City, that maybe they could’ve solved with another year or two of dev time. (Hopefully, will be solved in a Def Ed a year or two down the line.) That isn’t necessarily dev time they had, though. Not without taking out a ton of loans (do you really want tencent to own more than 30%?) and risking ill-will with consumers and WotC. (The game was meant to come out over a year ago.)

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve played through A3 and loved it. I don’t think your “beast of a PC” is as good as you think it is.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know what your problem is with Act 3. It might not be as good as the rest, but it’s still plenty good and better than most modern games. I just killed >!Gortash!< after completing nearly every side quest I could find and I haven’t really had any issues. Sure, there’s a few things that could be a little more fleshed out or that feel like cut content, but not much. I also don’t know how many of those things are actually cut content and not just references. Like in Cazador’s manor there’s >!a body with a note talking about a sleep potion and acid poison. I’m pretty sure it’s just a Romeo and Julie reference. He took the sleep potion to fake death, his lover found him apparently dead and killed herself. He found her dead and killed himself.!< There may have been plans for a quest there, but idk.

    • cheery_coffee@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not very far into this game, but boy is it fun, and I can’t believe how much you can interact with stuff. I’m constantly getting into weird predicaments and I love it